Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
The agreement prohibits posting content that infringes patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, rights of publicity, or other proprietary rights, covering the full range of intellectual property categories.
This analysis describes what GitHub's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes user obligations regarding intellectual property across all content posted to GitHub, and violations may trigger content removal or account suspension under GitHub's DMCA takedown process and the broader AUP enforcement authority.
Under this clause, users are prohibited from posting content that infringes any intellectual property right, and infringing content is subject to removal under both this policy and GitHub's DMCA takedown procedures. The agreement does not limit this obligation to copyright; it extends to patents, trademarks, trade secrets, and rights of publicity.
How other platforms handle this
Datadog reserves the right, but does not assume the obligation, to investigate any violation of these Terms or misuse of the Site.
Pharmaceutical products
Offer eligibility is determined by Netflix at its sole discretion and we reserve the right to revoke an Offer and put your account on hold in the event that we determine you are not eligible.
Monitoring
GitHub has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"You may not post any information that infringes or violates someone else's patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright, right of publicity, or other proprietary right.Excerpt from GitHub's Acceptable Use Policies
1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision directly engages the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), under which GitHub operates a notice-and-takedown process. Patent and trademark infringement claims may engage federal patent law (35 U.S.C.) and the Lanham Act respectively, though GitHub's enforcement mechanism for those categories is less precisely defined than its DMCA process. The FTC Act may also be relevant to deceptive practices involving third-party intellectual property. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The breadth of the prohibition (covering patents, trade secrets, and rights of publicity in addition to copyright) extends beyond the DMCA's specific safe harbor framework. GitHub's liability protections under the DMCA safe harbor apply specifically to copyright; the policy's assertion of a broader IP prohibition may create enforcement complexity for open source repositories that include third-party code under licenses with patent or trademark implications. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU users may have additional protections or exposure under the EU Copyright Directive (Article 17), which imposes upload filter obligations on certain platforms. Open source projects incorporating code subject to patent claims in multiple jurisdictions should assess jurisdiction-specific risk. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations using GitHub to host proprietary code or open source projects with complex licensing should confirm that their repository content and CI/CD outputs comply with this provision. Third-party integrations and marketplace apps published through GitHub Marketplace should be assessed for potential IP infringement exposure. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should confirm that code repositories, documentation, and published packages do not include third-party patented methods, trademarked terms used without authorization, or content that could constitute a right of publicity violation. Where open source licenses are used, license compatibility and attribution requirements should be audited.
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Buried in Robinhood's customer agreement is broad authority to close your positions, suspend your account, and force arbitration. Here is what it actually says.
Stripe's terms authorize fund reserves, payout withholding, and account termination. Here is what the agreement states and what business owners should review.
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes user obligations regarding intellectual property across all content posted to GitHub, and violations may trigger content removal or account suspension under GitHub's DMCA takedown process and the broader AUP enforcement authority.
Under this clause, users are prohibited from posting content that infringes any intellectual property right, and infringing content is subject to removal under both this policy and GitHub's DMCA takedown procedures. The agreement does not limit this obligation to copyright; it extends to patents, trademarks, trade secrets, and rights of publicity.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by GitHub.