“Customer and Figma both agree to resolve disputes arising out of or relating to these Terms, Customer's use or contemplated use of the Services...in binding arbitration instead of court...”
This analysis describes what Figma's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Binding arbitration forecloses access to court for covered disputes, eliminating jury trials and limiting certain procedural rights available in litigation.
Interpretive note: The excerpt is truncated with an ellipsis; additional scope language or conditions may be present but are not available for analysis.
If you have a dispute with Figma arising from the Terms or your use or contemplated use of the Services, you cannot bring it to court; it must go to binding arbitration.
How other platforms handle this
If any part of these arbitration terms is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding...would allow class arbitration...this entire dispute resolution section will be unenforceable.
you may reject the change by sending us written notice within 30 days of the change to Credit Karma's address for Notice, in which case your account with Credit Karma will be immediately terminated
"Customer and Figma both agree to resolve disputes arising out of or relating to these Terms, Customer's use or contemplated use of the Services...in binding arbitration instead of court...Excerpt from Figma's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Binding arbitration forecloses access to court for covered disputes, eliminating jury trials and limiting certain procedural rights available in litigation.
If you have a dispute with Figma arising from the Terms or your use or contemplated use of the Services, you cannot bring it to court; it must go to binding arbitration.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Figma.