Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what Figma's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Binding arbitration forecloses access to court for covered disputes, eliminating jury trials and limiting certain procedural rights available in litigation.
Interpretive note: The excerpt is truncated with an ellipsis; additional scope language or conditions may be present but are not available for analysis.
The removal of the Subprocessors list link makes it less convenient for users, particularly enterprise and EU-based customers who rely on this information for data protection compliance, to verify which third parties Figma engages to process their data. While the subprocessor information may still exist on Figma's website, removing the direct link from the Terms of Service reduces accessibility and transparency. Enterprise customers and those subject to GDPR may need to contact Figma directly to access current subprocessor information.
View change record →If you have a dispute with Figma arising from the Terms or your use or contemplated use of the Services, you cannot bring it to court; it must go to binding arbitration.
How other platforms handle this
except disputes relating to the enforcement or validity of your, your licensors', our, or our licensors' intellectual property rights
This Arbitration Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall include any claims brought by or against any third parties, including but not limited to your spouses, heirs, third-party beneficiaries and permitted assigns...
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
Monitoring
Figma has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"Customer and Figma both agree to resolve disputes arising out of or relating to these Terms, Customer's use or contemplated use of the Services...in binding arbitration instead of court...Excerpt from Figma's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
Binding arbitration forecloses access to court for covered disputes, eliminating jury trials and limiting certain procedural rights available in litigation.
If you have a dispute with Figma arising from the Terms or your use or contemplated use of the Services, you cannot bring it to court; it must go to binding arbitration.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 211 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Figma.