Any legal disputes about these Terms will be governed by North Carolina state law, regardless of where in the world you live.
This analysis describes what Epic Games's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The selection of governing law determines which state's substantive legal standards apply to contract interpretation, performance obligations, and dispute resolution. This choice affects the procedural and substantive rules that courts or arbitrators would apply when interpreting the agreement's terms.
Non-U.S. users and those from states with stronger consumer protection laws than North Carolina may find that the chosen governing law limits certain protections they would otherwise have in their home jurisdiction, though the agreement acknowledges that local laws may override certain provisions for non-U.S. residents.
How other platforms handle this
These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of law principles. Any disputes not subject to arbitration shall be resolved exclusively in the state or federal courts located in San Francisco County, California, and you consent to the personal jurisd...
These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan, without regard to its conflict of law provisions. To the extent that any lawsuit or court proceeding is permitted hereunder, you and StockX agree to submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction ...
This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein, without regard to conflict of law principles. Each party irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Ontario, Canada for t...
Monitoring
Epic Games has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of North Carolina, without giving effect to any choice of law principles that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.— Excerpt from Epic Games's Epic Games Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Choice of law clauses designating a specific U.S. state as the governing jurisdiction are standard in U.S.-based platform terms but may not be fully effective in jurisdictions where consumer protection law mandates that local law applies to consumer contracts. EU consumer protection law generally requires that consumers in member states benefit from the protections of their local law regardless of contractual choice of law. UK consumer protection law similarly limits the effect of choice of law clauses in consumer contracts. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low to Medium. North Carolina law is a recognized and well-developed legal framework. The primary compliance consideration is ensuring that local law overrides are properly implemented for EU, UK, and other jurisdictions where contractual choice of law does not fully displace local consumer protections. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK users retain the benefit of their local consumer protection laws under applicable EU and UK regulations regardless of this clause. California consumers may similarly retain rights under California law that cannot be waived by contract. Organizations operating in multiple jurisdictions should map the interaction between North Carolina law and local mandatory consumer protection requirements. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: In B2B contexts, the North Carolina governing law designation is a standard commercial consideration. Counterparties in other jurisdictions should assess whether their own contractual obligations or regulatory requirements create conflicts with this choice of law. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams in EU, UK, and other non-U.S. markets should confirm that localized versions of Epic's Terms properly reflect the mandatory local law provisions that override the North Carolina governing law clause, and that Epic's operational practices in those markets align with local requirements rather than relying solely on the contractual choice of law.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The selection of governing law determines which state's substantive legal standards apply to contract interpretation, performance obligations, and dispute resolution. This choice affects the procedural and substantive rules that courts or arbitrators would apply when interpreting the agreement's terms.
Non-U.S. users and those from states with stronger consumer protection laws than North Carolina may find that the chosen governing law limits certain protections they would otherwise have in their home jurisdiction, though the agreement acknowledges that local laws may override certain provisions for non-U.S. residents.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 175 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Epic Games.