ElevenLabs · ElevenLabs Safety Policy · View original document ↗

Voice Cloning Consent Requirement

High severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity ElevenLabs recorded 24 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for ElevenLabs Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

The document states that users are prohibited from using ElevenLabs' voice cloning features to replicate another person's voice unless they have obtained that person's authorization. This applies to voice models that mimic real, identifiable individuals.

This analysis describes what ElevenLabs's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision establishes a contractual consent obligation for all voice cloning activities on the platform. Under this clause, users who clone third-party voices without authorization are in breach of the stated terms and may be subject to account enforcement actions including suspension.

Interpretive note: The document asserts a consent requirement but does not specify a verification mechanism, creating ambiguity about whether the obligation is operationally enforced prior to processing or only enforceable after a violation is detected.

Change history

modified May 21, 2026

Language simplified from prescriptive requirements with enforcement consequences to direct prohibition format; removed specific mention of account suspension and law enforcement referral from the provision itself.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

This provision requires users to obtain explicit authorization from any individual whose voice they intend to clone or replicate using ElevenLabs' tools. Users who generate voice models of real individuals without documented consent are operating outside the stated terms and may be subject to account-level enforcement.

How other platforms handle this

Redfin Medium

If you consent to receive calls and SMS text messages from Redfin, that consent is exclusive to Redfin and its partners and affiliates, and is collected solely for the purpose of obtaining your permission to call or text you as part of providing you with the Services or to send you marketing message...

Affirm Medium

By creating an Affirm account or using the Services, you consent to receive electronically all communications, agreements, documents, notices and disclosures (collectively, 'Communications') that Affirm provides in connection with your Affirm account and use of the Services. Communications include, ...

Afterpay Medium

If you choose to open an Account, Afterpay may send you SMS messages. You agree to receive SMS messages at any time of day to each telephone number provided by you to Afterpay, regardless of whether such telephone number is on a corporate, state or federal do-not-call registry. You certify, represen...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

ElevenLabs has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You may not clone or replicate another person's voice without their authorization. This includes creating voice models that mimic real individuals without their consent.

— Excerpt from ElevenLabs's ElevenLabs Safety Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), which requires written consent and a publicly available retention policy before collecting biometric identifiers including voiceprints. Texas CUBI Act and Washington's biometric privacy statute impose similar affirmative consent obligations. At the federal level, the FTC has issued guidance on AI impersonation addressing voice cloning misuse. GDPR Article 9 classifies biometric data used for unique identification as a special category requiring explicit consent under Article 9(2)(a) for processing. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The provision asserts a consent requirement but does not specify the mechanism by which ElevenLabs verifies consent was obtained before a voice cloning request is processed. This creates a compliance gap for enterprise customers whose end-users may submit voice cloning requests without adequate consent documentation, potentially exposing both ElevenLabs and its B2B customers to liability under BIPA and equivalent state statutes. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: Illinois BIPA creates the highest exposure, as it provides a private right of action and statutory damages of $1,000 to $5,000 per violation. Texas and Washington impose similar restrictions without a private right of action. California CPRA classifies voiceprint data as sensitive personal information requiring opt-in consent. EU users are subject to GDPR Article 9, which requires explicit consent as the lawful basis for biometric data processing in most use cases. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise customers integrating ElevenLabs' API should evaluate whether their own terms of service and consent mechanisms satisfy BIPA and CPRA requirements for end-user voice data collection. Vendor agreements should address indemnification for third-party voice cloning claims arising from end-user misuse, and should confirm whether ElevenLabs' stated consent requirement creates a contractual pass-through obligation on B2B customers. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should implement consent documentation procedures before deploying voice cloning features, including written authorization from voice subjects specifying the scope and duration of permitted use. Data mapping updates should classify voice prints as biometric and sensitive personal information under applicable state statutes. Legal teams should assess whether existing privacy notices adequately disclose voice biometric data collection and processing activities.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has issued guidance on AI impersonation and voice cloning misuse under its unfair and deceptive practices authority, making it the primary federal enforcement authority relevant to this provision.
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    State attorneys general in Illinois, Texas, Washington, and California have enforcement authority over biometric privacy statutes and sensitive personal information protections that apply to voice cloning without consent.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

EU AI Act
European Union
California AB 2013 AI Training Data Transparency
US-CA
CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
ePrivacy Directive
European Union
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
GDPR
European Union
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
ElevenLabs Safety Policy
Entity
ElevenLabs
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 21, 2026
Last verified
May 21, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-012010
Document ID
CA-D-00833
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
a19a810eb62d44f7014a126b15d31b3bb6e54e526e2e20f505bf427abea13cb8
Analysis generated
May 21, 2026 03:43 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: ElevenLabs
Document: ElevenLabs Safety Policy
Record ID: CA-P-012010
Captured: 2026-05-21 03:43:37 UTC
SHA-256: a19a810eb62d44f7…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/elevenlabs/elevenlabs-safety-policy/voice-cloning-consent-requirement/
Accessed: June 27, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does ElevenLabs's Voice Cloning Consent Requirement clause do?

This provision establishes a contractual consent obligation for all voice cloning activities on the platform. Under this clause, users who clone third-party voices without authorization are in breach of the stated terms and may be subject to account enforcement actions including suspension.

How does this clause affect you?

This provision requires users to obtain explicit authorization from any individual whose voice they intend to clone or replicate using ElevenLabs' tools. Users who generate voice models of real individuals without documented consent are operating outside the stated terms and may be subject to account-level enforcement.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with ElevenLabs?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ElevenLabs.