This analysis describes what Discord's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
California law will govern these Terms except for its conflicts of laws principles.
the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") governs the interpretation and enforcement of this arbitration provision; the arbitrator shall apply California law to all other matters.
This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California without giving effect to any principles of conflict of laws...
"These terms and all Disputes between you and Discord, whether in arbitration or court (if a Dispute is non-arbitrable under these terms for any other reason), shall be governed by the law of the United States and the laws of California, without regard to conflicts of law provisions...Excerpt from Discord's Terms of Service
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “These terms and all Disputes between you and Discord, whether in arbitration or court (if a Dispute is non-arbitrable under these terms for any other reason), shall be governed by the law of the United States and the laws of California, without regard to conflicts of law provisions...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 264 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Discord.