This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
If you create an account or use the Services on behalf of another person or entity, you must have the authority to accept these Terms on their behalf.
This electronic document, and all other electronic documents referred to or incorporated herein, will be: (a) deemed for all purposes to be a "writing" or "in writing"...and (b) legally enforceable as a signed agreement.
Neither Party will have the power or authority to bind the other or incur any obligations on the other's behalf without the other Party's prior written consent.
"If you are using the Sites on behalf of any entity you represent and warrant that you are authorized to accept these Terms on such entity's behalf and, by accepting these Terms, you are hereby binding such entity to the Terms.Excerpt from Databricks's Terms of Service
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “If you are using the Sites on behalf of any entity you represent and warrant that you are authorized to accept these Terms on such entity's behalf and, by accepting these Terms, you are hereby binding such entity to the Terms.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 290 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.