This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The prohibition is triggered by potential—not actual—harm, meaning even uses that could cause interference are barred, giving the restriction broad practical reach.
You are prohibited from any use of the Sites that could interfere with, damage, disable, overburden, or impair the Sites or Databricks' systems or networks.
How other platforms handle this
You may not display any personal contact, banking, or peer-to-peer payment information, whether in relation to you or any other person (for example, names, home addresses or postcodes, telephone numbers, email addresses, URLs, credit/debit card...)
Bypass or ignore instructions contained in our robots.txt file that controls automated access to portions of our Services;
Send content created in Mailchimp through another service.
"Use the Sites in any manner...that could in any way (a) interfere with, damage, disable, overburden or impair the functioning of the Sites, or Databricks' systems or networks...Excerpt from Databricks's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The prohibition is triggered by potential—not actual—harm, meaning even uses that could cause interference are barred, giving the restriction broad practical reach.
You are prohibited from any use of the Sites that could interfere with, damage, disable, overburden, or impair the Sites or Databricks' systems or networks.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 282 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.