Provision record
Databricks · Databricks AI Acceptable Use Policy · View original document ↗

Spam and Unauthorized Communications Prohibition

Low severity High confidence Explicit document language Common · 282 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Databricks and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

The AUP prohibits using Databricks Services to send unsolicited commercial communications or spam, and prohibits sending communications with falsified or deceptive source information including spoofing and phishing.

This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision establishes contractual prohibitions on spam and deceptive communications conduct that also engages with the CAN-SPAM Act and applicable anti-fraud statutes, creating dual contractual and regulatory exposure for violations.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The agreement prohibits use of Databricks Services for sending unsolicited communications, spam, or phishing messages, with violations constituting a breach of the AUP.

How other platforms handle this

TikTok Medium

use TikTok Content...another user's content or generative AI-enabled features for commercial purposes unless permitted by TikTok USDS Joint Venture or the user, respectively...

Hulu Medium

access or use the Services in a manner that suggests an association with our products, services or brands

Glassdoor Medium

Send messages in violation of the USA CAN-SPAM Act or any other applicable anti-spam law.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Send unsolicited communications, promotions, advertisements, or spam; Send altered, deceptive, or false source-identifying information, including 'spoofing' or 'phishing'.

Excerpt from Databricks's AI Acceptable Use Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC enforces the CAN-SPAM Act, which is directly relevant to the spam and deceptive communications prohibitions in this provision.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

CFAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Databricks AI Acceptable Use Policy
Entity
Databricks
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 21, 2026
Last verified
May 21, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-013091
Document ID
CA-D-00838
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
401d30e8ae58ad51cb53077f833c2704cf60e064d26c5e24eb94b447171f196c
Analysis generated
May 21, 2026 04:54 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Databricks
Document: Databricks AI Acceptable Use Policy
Record ID: CA-P-013091
Captured: 2026-05-21 04:54:09 UTC
SHA-256: 401d30e8ae58ad51…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/databricks/databricks-ai-acceptable-use-policy/provision/CA-P-013091/spam-and-unauthorized-communications-prohibition/
Accessed: July 30, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Low
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Databricks's Spam and Unauthorized Communications Prohibition clause do?

This provision establishes contractual prohibitions on spam and deceptive communications conduct that also engages with the CAN-SPAM Act and applicable anti-fraud statutes, creating dual contractual and regulatory exposure for violations.

How does this clause affect you?

The agreement prohibits use of Databricks Services for sending unsolicited communications, spam, or phishing messages, with violations constituting a breach of the AUP.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 282 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Databricks?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.