10 Total
0 High severity
6 Medium severity
4 Low severity
Summary

This is Databricks' Acceptable Use Policy, which defines what users and their authorized third parties may and may not do when using Databricks' data and AI platform services. The policy prohibits a specific list of activities including generating CSAM, facilitating distributed denial-of-service attacks, circumventing platform security, violating export controls, and building AI applications that deploy deceptive, manipulative, or autonomously acting systems without human oversight. The policy also expressly prohibits using Databricks Services to collect or harvest data from other users without authorization and requires compliance with a separately published set of Databricks AI guidelines.

Technical / Legal Breakdown

This document is Databricks' Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), which governs permissible and prohibited use of the Databricks Services and is incorporated by reference into the applicable agreement between Databricks and its users or customers. The AUP states that users 'shall not, nor permit third parties to, use the Databricks Services' for an enumerated list of prohibited activities, including generating illegal content, facilitating cyberattacks, violating export controls, engaging in unauthorized data collection, and developing or deploying AI systems that violate applicable law or Databricks' AI guidelines. The AUP includes a dedicated AI-specific prohibition section that bars users from using Databricks Services to build AI applications that engage in deception, manipulation, illegal discrimination, privacy violations, or deployment of autonomous AI agents without human oversight, which represents an operationally distinct set of obligations compared to typical cloud platform AUPs that do not address AI governance at this level of specificity. The document engages with export control frameworks including U.S. Export Administration Regulations and OFAC sanctions, anti-fraud and cybercrime statutes, data protection frameworks including GDPR and CCPA, and the emerging EU AI Act regulatory landscape, particularly with respect to prohibited AI use cases. Compliance teams should note that the AUP incorporates Databricks' separate AI guidelines by reference, creating a two-document compliance obligation, and that violation of the AUP may constitute a material breach of the applicable master services or subscription agreement, with potential consequences including service termination.

Institutional Analysis

Institutional analysis available with Compliance

Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Compliance.

Start Compliance free trial
Medium — 6 provisions
Low — 4 provisions

Monitoring

Databricks has updated this document before.

Monitor includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?

Compliance includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.

Start Compliance free trial

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle AI Application Development Prohibitions and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Mapped Governance Frameworks

CFAA
United States Federal
View official text ↗
Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
Last Captured May 12, 2026 05:45 UTC
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000838
Version ID CA-V-002490
SHA-256 cc0a676f2ae0fc75aef64c0e300bae16cc7487f2c7ba0ec2f0e83df3e7546c8f
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Text extracted ✓ Change verified ✓ Hash verified

Governance Monitoring

Monitor governance changes across the platforms you rely on.

Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.

Create free account Compare plans