Provision record
Databricks · Databricks AI Acceptable Use Policy · View original document ↗

Prohibition on Interfering with or Harming Services

High confidence Common · 273 of 343 platforms

Key Facts · in the document’s own words

What does Databricks prohibit users from attempting to do?
“attempt to (a) interfere with, harm, or disrupt the Databricks Services...”
Version CA-V-006771, captured Sept. 11, 2026 · live source ↗
Our reading, not the document’s words
Databricks prohibits users from attempting to interfere with, harm, or disrupt the Databricks Services.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Databricks and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

The prohibition reaches attempted interference, harm, or disruption—not only successful acts—broadening the scope of prohibited conduct.

⚠

Interpretive note: The excerpt appears to be item (a) of a larger list of prohibited attempts. Other items in that list are not visible in the excerpt and are therefore omitted from the canonical claim.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Readers are prohibited from even attempting to interfere with, harm, or disrupt the Databricks Services.

How other platforms handle this

Teladoc

Alter or modify any part of the content or services offered on or through the Websites and Platforms

Kling AI

impersonate any person or entity, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent you or your affiliation with any person or entity...

Groq

in a manner that burdens, disables, impairs, or interferes with the Cloud Services or AI Model Services or the equipment used to provide the Cloud Services or AI Model Services

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
attempt to (a) interfere with, harm, or disrupt the Databricks Services...

Excerpt from Databricks's AI Acceptable Use Policy

Provision details

Document information
Document
Databricks AI Acceptable Use Policy
Entity
Databricks
Date stated by the document
March 20, 2026
As printed in Databricks’s text (version CA-V-006771), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 12, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006771, captured Sept. 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-062230
Document ID
CA-D-000838
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006771)
2aaf7a2013c0b8a178bfc6d4c8b8f0a6fa0d1ddb516cb46b986a6f0871d0fcc3
Analysis generated
May 21, 2026 04:54 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006771, captured Sept. 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Databricks
Document: Databricks AI Acceptable Use Policy
Record ID: CA-P-062230
Version: CA-V-006771
Captured: 2026-09-11 00:56:38 UTC
SHA-256: 2aaf7a2013c0b8a1…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/databricks/databricks-ai-acceptable-use-policy/provision/CA-P-062230/prohibition-on-interfering-with-or-harming-services/
Accessed: Nov. 1, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Databricks's Prohibition on Interfering with or Harming Services clause do?

The prohibition reaches attempted interference, harm, or disruption—not only successful acts—broadening the scope of prohibited conduct.

How does this clause affect you?

Readers are prohibited from even attempting to interfere with, harm, or disrupt the Databricks Services.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 273 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Databricks?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.