Databricks · Databricks AI Acceptable Use Policy · View original document ↗

Prohibition on Interfering with or Harming Services

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 285 of 352 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Databricks Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.

This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The prohibition reaches attempted interference, harm, or disruption—not only successful acts—broadening the scope of prohibited conduct.

Interpretive note: The excerpt appears to be item (a) of a larger list of prohibited attempts. Other items in that list are not visible in the excerpt and are therefore omitted from the canonical claim.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Readers are prohibited from even attempting to interfere with, harm, or disrupt the Databricks Services.

How other platforms handle this

Mixpanel Medium

use the Application Services in a manner that overburdens, or that threatens the integrity, performance, or availability of, the Application Services

Upwork Medium

use our services to build a similar service, identify or poach our users or publish any performance or benchmark analysis relating to the site reverse engineer, decipher, modify, or take source code from our site...

NVIDIA NIM Medium

Customer may not indicate that a product or service developed with the Software is sponsored or endorsed by NVIDIA unless expressly authorized in writing by NVIDIA.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Databricks has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
attempt to (a) interfere with, harm, or disrupt the Databricks Services...

— Excerpt from Databricks's Databricks AI Acceptable Use Policy

Applicable regulations

CFAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Databricks AI Acceptable Use Policy
Entity
Databricks
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 21, 2026
Last verified
May 21, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-062230
Document ID
CA-D-00838
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
401d30e8ae58ad51cb53077f833c2704cf60e064d26c5e24eb94b447171f196c
Analysis generated
May 21, 2026 04:54 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Databricks
Document: Databricks AI Acceptable Use Policy
Record ID: CA-P-062230
Captured: 2026-05-21 04:54:09 UTC
SHA-256: 401d30e8ae58ad51…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/databricks/databricks-ai-acceptable-use-policy/provision/CA-P-062230/prohibition-on-interfering-with-or-harming-services/
Accessed: July 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Databricks's Prohibition on Interfering with or Harming Services clause do?

The prohibition reaches attempted interference, harm, or disruption—not only successful acts—broadening the scope of prohibited conduct.

How does this clause affect you?

Readers are prohibited from even attempting to interfere with, harm, or disrupt the Databricks Services.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 285 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Databricks?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.