This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The prohibition reaches attempted interference, harm, or disruption—not only successful acts—broadening the scope of prohibited conduct.
Interpretive note: The excerpt appears to be item (a) of a larger list of prohibited attempts. Other items in that list are not visible in the excerpt and are therefore omitted from the canonical claim.
Readers are prohibited from even attempting to interfere with, harm, or disrupt the Databricks Services.
How other platforms handle this
"Frame" or "mirror" any part of our Services without Tinder's prior written authorization;
Send content created in Mailchimp through another service.
index, frame, embed or link to the Services in a manner not authorized by us, or to collect information about users for the purpose of sending, facilitating, or encouraging unsolicited bulk or other communications
"attempt to (a) interfere with, harm, or disrupt the Databricks Services...Excerpt from Databricks's AI Acceptable Use Policy
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The prohibition reaches attempted interference, harm, or disruption—not only successful acts—broadening the scope of prohibited conduct.
Readers are prohibited from even attempting to interfere with, harm, or disrupt the Databricks Services.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 282 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.