The AUP prohibits denial-of-service attacks, disruptive activity targeting Databricks or other users' systems, and any attempt to gain unauthorized access to Databricks Services, systems, networks, or data.
This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes contractual prohibitions on cyberattack conduct that are also independently governed by applicable computer fraud and cybercrime statutes, reinforcing legal obligations through the AUP framework.
The agreement prohibits any conduct that disrupts Databricks platform operations or attempts unauthorized access to platform systems, with violations constituting a breach of the AUP and potentially the underlying service agreement.
How other platforms handle this
You may not display any personal contact, banking, or peer-to-peer payment information, whether in relation to you or any other person (for example, names, home addresses or postcodes, telephone numbers, email addresses, URLs, credit/debit card...)
Bypass or ignore instructions contained in our robots.txt file that controls automated access to portions of our Services;
Send content created in Mailchimp through another service.
"Conduct denial of service attacks or distribute, run, or engage in activity that damages or disrupts the operation of the Databricks Services, networks, systems, servers, or endpoints of Databricks or other users; Attempt to gain unauthorized access to the Databricks Services, its related systems, networks or data.Excerpt from Databricks's AI Acceptable Use Policy
1.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This provision establishes contractual prohibitions on cyberattack conduct that are also independently governed by applicable computer fraud and cybercrime statutes, reinforcing legal obligations through the AUP framework.
The agreement prohibits any conduct that disrupts Databricks platform operations or attempts unauthorized access to platform systems, with violations constituting a breach of the AUP and potentially the underlying service agreement.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 282 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.