This analysis describes what Cursor's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause operationalizes the allocation of risk for AI suggestion quality by requiring users to acknowledge specific technical limitations of AI models and establishing that evaluation and risk-bearing responsibilities rest with the user rather than the service provider. The provision functions to set baseline expectations about suggestion reliability within the service.
Users are required to independently evaluate all AI suggestions before use and accept responsibility for any consequences arising from reliance on suggestions, including those containing errors, outdated information, or outputs reflecting training data limitations. The terms do not authorize Cursor to warrant accuracy or completeness of suggestions.
How other platforms handle this
This is still Your Content, and you are responsible for it and its accuracy, as well as your use of it on our Services and any and all decisions made, actions taken, and failures to take action based on Your Content.
evaluate Asana AI outputs for accuracy and appropriateness in light of the probabilistic nature of AI and potential for producing inaccurate content.
AI outputs may be incomplete, inaccurate, outdated, inappropriate, or inconsistent and may change over time. They are not a substitute for professional advice...You are responsible for your use of Outputs...
"You acknowledge that there are numerous limitations that apply with respect to Suggestions provided by large language and other AI models (each an "AI Model"), including that (i) Suggestions may contain errors or misleading information, (ii) AI Models are based on predefined rules and algorithms that lack the ability to think creatively and come up with new ideas and can result in repetitive or formulaic content, (iii) AI Models can struggle with understanding the nuances of language, including slang, idioms, and cultural references, (iv) AI Models can struggle with complex tasks that require reasoning, judgment and decision-making, and (v) data used to train AI models may be of poor quality or biased. You agree that you are responsible for evaluating, and bearing all risks associated with, the use of any Suggestions, including any reliance on the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of Suggestions.Excerpt from Cursor's Terms of Service
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This clause operationalizes the allocation of risk for AI suggestion quality by requiring users to acknowledge specific technical limitations of AI models and establishing that evaluation and risk-bearing responsibilities rest with the user rather than the service provider. The provision functions to set baseline expectations about suggestion reliability within the service.
Users are required to independently evaluate all AI suggestions before use and accept responsibility for any consequences arising from reliance on suggestions, including those containing errors, outdated information, or outputs reflecting training data limitations. The terms do not authorize Cursor to warrant accuracy or completeness of suggestions.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 217 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cursor.