This analysis describes what Cohere's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Notwithstanding the foregoing, either Party may seek injunctive relief in any court of appropriate jurisdiction with respect to any alleged breach of such Party's Intellectual Property Rights, breaches of Confidentiality...
Any claim for injunctive relief with respect to a violation of section D.9 may be brought in any jurisdiction.
provided that AI21 may seek equitable relief in any court of competent jurisdiction.
Monitoring
Cohere has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"This choice of jurisdiction does not prevent Cohere from seeking injunctive relief with respect to a violation of intellectual property rights or confidentiality obligations in any appropriate jurisdiction.— Excerpt from Cohere's Cohere SaaS Agreement
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The clause states: “This choice of jurisdiction does not prevent Cohere from seeking injunctive relief with respect to a violation of intellectual property rights or confidentiality obligations in any appropriate jurisdiction.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 270 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cohere.