8 Total
6 High severity
2 Medium severity
0 Low severity
Summary

This document establishes Cohere's usage restrictions for its API services and AI models, applicable to developers and enterprises deploying Cohere technology. The policy prohibits specific use cases including generation of content related to weapons of mass destruction, child sexual abuse material, cyberattacks, non-consensual intimate imagery, and coordinated disinformation. Operators deploying Cohere's API assume responsibility for ensuring downstream applications do not facilitate these prohibited categories.

Technical / Legal Breakdown

This document is Cohere's Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) governing permissible and prohibited uses of its AI models, APIs, and related services, including the Command R and Command R+ model family. The terms establish categories of prohibited conduct, including using the services to generate content that facilitates weapons of mass destruction, CSAM, cyberattacks, disinformation, and non-consensual intimate imagery, and the agreement states that operators and users bear responsibility for ensuring downstream applications comply with these restrictions. The policy distinguishes between operator-level permissions (businesses building on the API) and end-user-level permissions, establishing a layered responsibility framework in which operators may customize permitted behaviors within bounds Cohere sets, which is operationally notable for B2B compliance teams assessing liability allocation in API deployment contexts. The document engages regulatory frameworks including the EU AI Act, which classifies certain AI applications as prohibited or high-risk, and relevant national laws governing CSAM, cyberweapons, and election interference; compliance obligations under these frameworks may constrain or supplement how the AUP terms apply in practice, depending on jurisdiction. Material compliance considerations include the policy's prohibition on use in certain high-stakes autonomous decision-making contexts without human oversight, and its explicit restriction on generating synthetic media of real persons without consent, both of which interact with emerging AI governance obligations in the EU and several US states.

Institutional Analysis

Institutional analysis available with Compliance

Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Compliance.

Start Compliance free trial
High — 6 provisions
Medium — 2 provisions

Monitoring

Cohere has updated this document before.

Monitor includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?

Compliance includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.

Start Compliance free trial

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Operator Responsibility for Downstream Use and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Mapped Governance Frameworks

California AB 2013 AI Training Data Transparency
US-CA
View official text ↗
Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
Last Captured June 11, 2026 00:53 UTC
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000830
Version ID CA-V-003670
SHA-256 39e9fdf1b74bf27a1bec1f84f744456e149403b699b9ae114953d2be6207cf18
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Text extracted ✓ Change verified ✓ Hash verified

Governance Monitoring

Monitor governance changes across the platforms you rely on.

Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.

Create free account Compare plans