“You shall not (i) represent that Output was human-generated, (ii) violate any of the model provider's license and usage restrictions or (iii) violate applicable law in connection with the use of the Output.”
You are not allowed to claim that AI-generated content produced by the Cerebras service was created by a human.
This analysis describes what Cerebras's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users who present AI-generated output as human-created violate this prohibition, which could have consequences for their continued use of the service.
Interpretive note: The excerpt contains two additional independent prohibitions (clauses (ii) and (iii)) that are omitted from the canonical claim per the single-proposition rule.
Users and businesses who use Cerebras to generate content must not present that content as human-created, which has implications for marketing, journalism, customer service, and any context where human authorship is material.
How other platforms handle this
Written claims concerning copyright infringement must include the following information: A physical or electronic signature...A description of the copyrighted work...A description of where the allegedly infringing material is located...
We do not monitor, recognize, or honor any opt-out or do not track mechanisms, including general web browser "Do Not Track" settings and/or signals or other mechanisms that provide consumers the ability to exercise choice...
as such disclosure may be required by the order or requirement of a court, administrative agency or other governmental body, subject to the Receiving Party providing to the Disclosing Party reasonable written notice...
"You shall not (i) represent that Output was human-generated, (ii) violate any of the model provider's license and usage restrictions or (iii) violate applicable law in connection with the use of the Output.Excerpt from Cerebras's Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision aligns with FTC guidance on AI-generated content disclosure and the principle that representing AI outputs as human-created may constitute a deceptive practice.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Users who present AI-generated output as human-created violate this prohibition, which could have consequences for their continued use of the service.
Users and businesses who use Cerebras to generate content must not present that content as human-created, which has implications for marketing, journalism, customer service, and any context where human authorship is material.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cerebras.