“In the unlikely event that we have not been able to resolve a Claim after sixty (60) days, we each agree to resolve such Claim exclusively through binding arbitration by JAMS before a single arbitrator... under the Optional Expedited Arbitration Procedures then in effect for JAMS.”
This analysis describes what Cerebras's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Mandatory binding arbitration eliminates the user's ability to bring covered claims in court or participate in a class action, and the expedited procedure limits the process available.
Interpretive note: The excerpt does not define the scope of 'such Claim'; the canonical claim uses that term without elaboration. The full clause may contain additional conditions not visible in the excerpt.
Readers must arbitrate covered claims through JAMS rather than litigate in court, and the arbitration proceeds under expedited rules before a single arbitrator.
How other platforms handle this
This section does not require informal dispute resolution or arbitration of the following claims: (i) individual claims brought in small claims court...
The arbitration of any Dispute shall be administered by JAMS and conducted in accordance with the JAMS rules, including any Mass Arbitration Procedures and Guidelines applicable to the Dispute ("JAMS Rules")...
you may reject the change by sending us written notice within 30 days of the change to Credit Karma's address for Notice, in which case your account with Credit Karma will be immediately terminated
"In the unlikely event that we have not been able to resolve a Claim after sixty (60) days, we each agree to resolve such Claim exclusively through binding arbitration by JAMS before a single arbitrator... under the Optional Expedited Arbitration Procedures then in effect for JAMS.Excerpt from Cerebras's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Mandatory binding arbitration eliminates the user's ability to bring covered claims in court or participate in a class action, and the expedited procedure limits the process available.
Readers must arbitrate covered claims through JAMS rather than litigate in court, and the arbitration proceeds under expedited rules before a single arbitrator.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cerebras.