This analysis describes what Brex's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
In the event Dispute Resolution Section 15 is for any reason held to be unenforceable, any litigation against Tinder (except for small claims court actions) may be commenced only in the federal or state courts located in Dallas County, Texas.
Any legal action or proceeding arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located in New York County, New York, USA...
it shall be adjudicated exclusively by the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California.
"Subject to Section 4.8 (Binding Arbitration), all litigation shall be brought in the state or federal courts located in Salt Lake County, Utah.Excerpt from Brex's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “Subject to Section 4.8 (Binding Arbitration), all litigation shall be brought in the state or federal courts located in Salt Lake County, Utah.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Brex.