This analysis describes what Boston Dynamics's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
we may disclose Confidential Information and Company Data if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such disclosure is reasonably necessary to: (i) comply with legal process, applicable laws or government requests...
We do not monitor, recognize, or honor any opt-out or do not track mechanisms, including general web browser "Do Not Track" settings and/or signals or other mechanisms that provide consumers the ability to exercise choice...
as such disclosure may be required by the order or requirement of a court, administrative agency or other governmental body, subject to the Receiving Party providing to the Disclosing Party reasonable written notice...
"...may also disclose such data if required to do so by law or Boston Dynamics determines that such preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to (1) comply with legal process, (2) enforce these Terms of Use...Excerpt from Boston Dynamics's Terms of Use
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “...may also disclose such data if required to do so by law or Boston Dynamics determines that such preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to (1) comply with legal process, (2) enforce these Terms of Use...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Boston Dynamics.