This analysis describes what AWS's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Such legal bases may include: the legitimate interest of the controller or third parties; for compliance with a legal or regulatory obligation by the data controller; for the execution of a contract; for regular exercise of rights in court...
We will not engage in training or product improvement with private server voice chat recordings of Brazil users.
We do not use what you say in email, chat, video calls or voice mail, or your documents, photos or other personal files, to target advertising to you.
"We process your personal information on one or more of the following legal bases: as necessary to enter into a contract with you or a legal entity you represent, to perform our contractual obligations...Excerpt from AWS's Privacy Notice
We read the privacy policies and terms of service of 38 AI platforms. Here is what they say about training, retention, arbitration, and liability.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “We process your personal information on one or more of the following legal bases: as necessary to enter into a contract with you or a legal entity you represent, to perform our contractual obligations...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 279 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS.