This analysis describes what AWS's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This commitment, scoped to definitions under the Colorado Privacy Act and Oregon Privacy Act, means AWS does not subject consumers to a category of high-stakes automated decision-making those laws specifically regulate.
Interpretive note: The scope of this commitment is explicitly limited to the definitions under the Colorado Privacy Act and Oregon Privacy Act. Profiling that does not meet those specific statutory definitions is not addressed by this clause.
Consumers are not subject to AWS profiling for automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects as those terms are defined under the Colorado Privacy Act or Oregon Privacy Act.
How other platforms handle this
Request a review of decisions made solely based on automated processing of personal data.
Mailchimp uses a combination of automated and human detection review processes to ensure that Members are complying with our Standard Terms of Use and this Acceptable Use Policy.
We may (but are not obligated to) use automated systems and human reviewers to record, monitor, analyse, modify, disable and, store and review use of our Interactive Features...
Monitoring
AWS has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"We do not engage in profiling of consumers in furtherance of automated decisions that produce legal or similarly significant effects, as those terms are defined under the Colorado Privacy Act or the Oregon Privacy Act.— Excerpt from AWS's AWS Privacy Notice
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This commitment, scoped to definitions under the Colorado Privacy Act and Oregon Privacy Act, means AWS does not subject consumers to a category of high-stakes automated decision-making those laws specifically regulate.
Consumers are not subject to AWS profiling for automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects as those terms are defined under the Colorado Privacy Act or Oregon Privacy Act.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 214 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS.