This analysis describes what AWS Bedrock's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Customers who rely on SCCs as their legal transfer mechanism should confirm both conditions are met; if either condition is absent, the SCCs do not apply and an alternative transfer mechanism may be required.
The updated terms establish a formal framework for AWS Bedrock's free exploration services, clarifying the operational boundaries and responsibilities. AWS reserves the right to discontinue these services at any time without prior notice, meaning customers cannot rely on their continuation for production planning. Customers are solely responsible for testing, deploying, and maintaining any code, documents, or AI solutions AWS provides, including determining whether those solutions comply with applicable law. AWS retains the right to develop competing products based on content it creates during these engagements, though this does not override existing non-disclosure agreements. Customers are prohibited from requiring AWS personnel to sign additional terms as a condition of receiving free services, and any such documentation signed by AWS personnel is void.
View change record →The updated terms establish new data-sharing mechanisms for users of Anthropic models on Amazon Bedrock. Specifically, AWS now explicitly authorizes notification to Anthropic of metadata present in requests sent to certain Anthropic products (e.g., Claude Code, computer use features), enabling Anthropic to conduct product-level usage attribution. Additionally, the terms introduce AWS WAF AI traffic monetization, which permits AWS to facilitate payment transactions between content publishers and buyers by sharing pricing, payment, and configuration information with payment providers and facilitators; the updated terms clarify that AWS does not provide regulated financial services and is not a party to fund flows, and that users' interactions with payment providers are governed by separate terms between the user and those parties. Users employing these features should review what metadata may be embedded in their requests and understand their own obligations to payment providers.
View change record →The updated terms now require users of certain Anthropic models to provide explicit consent for AWS to transfer their content and associated metadata to Anthropic for abuse detection and processing. Previously, abuse detection was described as an AWS-only internal function. The revised terms clarify that Bedrock stores service inputs and outputs for up to 30 days on identified models solely for abuse detection purposes. Users of Anthropic models can provide this consent through the opt-in mechanism described in the applicable service documentation, as stated in section 50.12.2.2 of the updated terms.
View change record →The SCC protections are conditional: they apply to you only if GDPR governs your use of AWS Services to process Customer Data and that data leaves the EEA directly or via onward transfer.
How other platforms handle this
we also transfer personal information to all other countries in which Adobe or its affiliates, providers, and partners operate. We carry out these transfers in compliance with applicable laws – for example, by putting data transfer agreements in place...
Each payment processor uses and processes your complete payment information in accordance with its applicable privacy policy (Stripe and PayPal).
These companies are subject to contractual obligations governing privacy, data security, and confidentiality consistent with applicable laws.
Monitoring
AWS Bedrock has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"The SCCs will only apply when: (i) the GDPR applies to your use of the AWS Services to process Customer Data; and (ii) Customer Data is transferred either directly or via onward transfer, to a country outside of the European Economic Area...— Excerpt from AWS Bedrock's AWS Service Terms
ConductAtlas detected a major restructuring of Meta’s privacy policy that removed detailed consumer rights disclosures and relocated them to separate documents.
Your genetic data may be transferred to a new owner as a business asset. Here is what the Terms of Service actually say and what you can do right now.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
Customers who rely on SCCs as their legal transfer mechanism should confirm both conditions are met; if either condition is absent, the SCCs do not apply and an alternative transfer mechanism may be required.
The SCC protections are conditional: they apply to you only if GDPR governs your use of AWS Services to process Customer Data and that data leaves the EEA directly or via onward transfer.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 289 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS Bedrock.