Provision record
AWS Bedrock · AWS Service Terms · View original document ↗

Third-Party Model Provider Policy Incorporation by Reference

High severity Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track AWS Bedrock and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

Using AI models from companies like Anthropic or Meta through Bedrock means you are also legally bound by each of those companies' own separate rules — not just AWS's rules.

ⓘ

This analysis describes what AWS Bedrock's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

By incorporating third-party policies by reference, this clause establishes that AWS Service Terms compliance alone is insufficient; users must also satisfy separate policy requirements established by each model provider, creating a multi-layered compliance obligation.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Sep 2, 2026

The updated terms remove the explicit reference to a Data Processing Addendum governing Anthropic data transfers, though the requirement to obtain opt-in consent for Anthropic model use remains in place. For Kiro users, the revised language now explicitly states that abuse detection includes retention and potential human review of inputs and outputs when selecting certain models. Users of Anthropic models on Bedrock should verify opt-in consent mechanisms in service documentation to understand data handling practices.

View change record →
High Aug 18, 2026

The updated terms establish a new project-based service structure for AWS (new) users, effective August 17, 2026, with new rules governing team member access and content ownership. Users who enable spend limits agree that AWS may suspend their account or project access upon reaching their limit, and may permanently close the account or project if not reactivated within an unspecified timeframe. Contributed content by team members becomes the project owner's property and is subject to a nonexclusive irrevocable license granted to all project members. You can configure AI services opt-out policies through AWS Settings; project owners can manage team member permissions and access controls.

View change record →
Medium Jul 30, 2026

The updated terms now explicitly state that AWS IoT SiteWise Scenario Discovery is not designed for real-time vehicle control and cannot be used as the sole basis for determining vehicle safety or regulatory compliance. Organizations deploying this service must implement independent human monitoring and safety validation before using its outputs to support vehicle system decisions. The terms make clear that AWS assumes no responsibility for uses that violate these constraints.

View change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Business customers must independently track and comply with the acceptable use policies of every third-party model provider available on Bedrock — policies that can change at any time — or risk AWS service suspension.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Third-Party Model Provider Policy Incorporation by Reference and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
When you use third-party models available in Amazon Bedrock, you must also comply with the applicable third-party model provider's use policies. These use policies are incorporated into these Service Terms by this reference.

Excerpt from AWS Bedrock's AWS Service Terms

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: This provision creates a chain of contractual privity across multiple legal entities, implicating contract law principles in all applicable jurisdictions.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
AWS Service Terms
Entity
AWS Bedrock
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 7, 2026
Last verified
May 7, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-005318
Document ID
CA-D-00648
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
8c96717daae1f374f3c175da7b75c1eeb2b3852949018350a8af38b245c1ef17
Analysis generated
May 7, 2026 18:28 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: AWS Bedrock
Document: AWS Service Terms
Record ID: CA-P-005318
Captured: 2026-05-07 18:28:56 UTC
SHA-256: 8c96717daae1f374…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/aws-bedrock/aws-service-terms/provision/CA-P-005318/third-party-model-provider-policy-incorporation-by-reference/
Accessed: Sept. 26, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does AWS Bedrock's Third-Party Model Provider Policy Incorporation by Reference clause do?

By incorporating third-party policies by reference, this clause establishes that AWS Service Terms compliance alone is insufficient; users must also satisfy separate policy requirements established by each model provider, creating a multi-layered compliance obligation.

How does this clause affect you?

Business customers must independently track and comply with the acceptable use policies of every third-party model provider available on Bedrock — policies that can change at any time — or risk AWS service suspension.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with AWS Bedrock?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS Bedrock.