AWS Bedrock · AWS Service Terms · View original document ↗

Acceptable Use Policy Restrictions

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Rare · 2 of 325 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for AWS Bedrock Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

There are rules about what you can and cannot build with Bedrock; prohibited uses include generating illegal content, harmful content, or content that infringes on other people's rights.

This analysis describes what AWS Bedrock's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Violations of the acceptable use policy can result in suspension or termination of your AWS account, which could disrupt production services if your AI application is found to violate these terms.

Interpretive note: The scope of terms such as 'harmful' and 'violates third-party rights' in the context of AI-generated content involves interpretive uncertainty given evolving legal standards around AI-generated content copyright and liability.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium May 9, 2026

This change introduces a new optional service feature rather than modifying existing consumer rights or obligations. AWS explicitly disclaims providing regulated financial services, holding custody o…

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Customers building AI applications on Bedrock must ensure their use cases and generated content comply with AWS's acceptable use policy; violations could result in service suspension affecting any dependent applications or infrastructure.

How other platforms handle this

Adyen Medium

You agree to comply with Adyen's Acceptable Use Policy, as updated from time to time, which forms part of these Terms and Conditions. Adyen reserves the right to update the Acceptable Use Policy at any time.

Atlassian Medium

Customer and its Users must use the Products in accordance with the Atlassian Acceptable Use Policy. Customer is responsible for ensuring that Users comply with this Agreement and the Atlassian Acceptable Use Policy.

Venmo Medium

You may not use the Venmo services for any illegal purpose, to send money to any person or organization on a government sanctions list, for gambling, for purchasing or selling illegal goods or services, or for any activity that violates applicable law. You may not use Venmo for commercial transactio...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

AWS Bedrock has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You must not use Amazon Bedrock in a manner that violates the AWS Acceptable Use Policy. This includes restrictions on using the service to generate content that is illegal, harmful, or that violates third-party rights.

— Excerpt from AWS Bedrock's AWS Service Terms

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The acceptable use restrictions interact with platform liability frameworks under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in the US, though Section 230 protections are less clearly applicable to AI-generated content than to user-generated content. EU Digital Services Act obligations and the EU AI Act's prohibited AI practices provisions (such as bans on certain manipulative AI systems) are also relevant for EU-facing deployments. FTC enforcement of deceptive AI practices and CFPB guidance on AI in financial services create additional compliance touchpoints. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The acceptable use policy creates broad discretionary enforcement authority for AWS, including account suspension. The scope of terms like 'harmful' and 'violates third-party rights' in the context of AI-generated content involves interpretive complexity, particularly around copyright in AI outputs, which remains an area of active legal development. Customers in content generation, marketing automation, and legal services face the most nuanced exposure. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU customers must assess whether their Bedrock use cases fall within the EU AI Act's prohibited practices categories, particularly for applications involving biometric data, social scoring, or subliminal manipulation. US customers in regulated advertising and financial services should assess FTC and CFPB guidance on AI-generated consumer communications. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise customers should review the AWS Acceptable Use Policy as a separate document incorporated by reference, as its terms can change and violations can trigger contract termination. SLAs and business continuity planning should account for the possibility of service suspension due to acceptable use determinations. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should map planned Bedrock use cases against the current acceptable use policy before deployment. AI governance frameworks should include a review step confirming compliance with AWS's acceptable use restrictions, particularly for use cases involving potentially sensitive content generation, automated decision-making, or customer-facing AI interactions.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Watcher free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    FTC has jurisdiction over deceptive or harmful AI-generated content used in consumer-facing applications, relevant to acceptable use enforcement context.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

CFAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
AWS Service Terms
Entity
AWS Bedrock
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 10, 2026
Last verified
May 10, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-008313
Document ID
CA-D-00648
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
6a4e46ce193fd71202def370a4d21430cf6cf24d11429695a18c773907dfd122
Analysis generated
May 10, 2026 05:07 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: AWS Bedrock
Document: AWS Service Terms
Record ID: CA-P-008313
Captured: 2026-05-10 05:07:03 UTC
SHA-256: 6a4e46ce193fd712…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/aws-bedrock/aws-service-terms/acceptable-use-policy-restrictions/
Accessed: May 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Professional free trial

Or start with Watcher →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does AWS Bedrock's Acceptable Use Policy Restrictions clause do?

Violations of the acceptable use policy can result in suspension or termination of your AWS account, which could disrupt production services if your AI application is found to violate these terms.

How does this clause affect you?

Customers building AI applications on Bedrock must ensure their use cases and generated content comply with AWS's acceptable use policy; violations could result in service suspension affecting any dependent applications or infrastructure.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 2 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with AWS Bedrock?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS Bedrock.