Provision record
AWS Bedrock · AWS Service Terms · View original document ↗

Acceptable Use Policy Restrictions

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Common · 281 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track AWS Bedrock and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

There are rules about what you can and cannot build with Bedrock; prohibited uses include generating illegal content, harmful content, or content that infringes on other people's rights.

This analysis describes what AWS Bedrock's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The provision anchors service usage rights to a separate policy framework, meaning the scope of permitted uses is defined by reference to the Acceptable Use Policy rather than stated directly in the service terms. This structure allows AWS to modify content restrictions through policy updates without amending the primary service agreement.

Interpretive note: The scope of terms such as 'harmful' and 'violates third-party rights' in the context of AI-generated content involves interpretive uncertainty given evolving legal standards around AI-generated content copyright and liability.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jul 30, 2026

The updated terms now explicitly state that AWS IoT SiteWise Scenario Discovery is not designed for real-time vehicle control and cannot be used as the sole basis for determining vehicle safety or regulatory compliance. Organizations deploying this service must implement independent human monitoring and safety validation before using its outputs to support vehicle system decisions. The terms make clear that AWS assumes no responsibility for uses that violate these constraints.

View change record →
Medium Jul 18, 2026

The updated terms establish new restrictions on how AWS Capacity Reservations may be used. Specifically, customers purchasing On-Demand Capacity Reservations can no longer resell them to other parties, and AWS reserves the right to cancel the purchase or terminate running instances if the company suspects resale activity. For Capacity Blocks for ML, the grace period before instance termination increased from 30 minutes to 60 minutes for UltraServer instance types, allowing slightly more time to complete workloads. The Amazon Sidewalk qualification program was renamed and simplified, but the underlying security and operational requirements remain in effect.

View change record →
Medium Jun 30, 2026

The updated terms establish a formal framework for AWS Bedrock's free exploration services, clarifying the operational boundaries and responsibilities. AWS reserves the right to discontinue these services at any time without prior notice, meaning customers cannot rely on their continuation for production planning. Customers are solely responsible for testing, deploying, and maintaining any code, documents, or AI solutions AWS provides, including determining whether those solutions comply with applicable law. AWS retains the right to develop competing products based on content it creates during these engagements, though this does not override existing non-disclosure agreements. Customers are prohibited from requiring AWS personnel to sign additional terms as a condition of receiving free services, and any such documentation signed by AWS personnel is void.

View change record →

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
May 10, 2026
First Seen
May 11, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 4245 other provisions on other platforms.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Customers building AI applications on Bedrock must ensure their use cases and generated content comply with AWS's acceptable use policy; violations could result in service suspension affecting any dependent applications or infrastructure.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

Use our Services in relation to any political campaign financing or for the purpose of influencing any election, other than sharing your own personal political opinions;

Mailchimp Medium

Host Content on our servers for any purpose other than for your use of the Service.

TikTok Medium

use TikTok Content...another user's content or generative AI-enabled features for commercial purposes unless permitted by TikTok USDS Joint Venture or the user, respectively...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You must not use Amazon Bedrock in a manner that violates the AWS Acceptable Use Policy. This includes restrictions on using the service to generate content that is illegal, harmful, or that violates third-party rights.

Excerpt from AWS Bedrock's AWS Service Terms

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The acceptable use restrictions interact with platform liability frameworks under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in the US, though Section 230 protections are less clearly applicable to AI-generated content than to …

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

CFAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
AWS Service Terms
Entity
AWS Bedrock
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 10, 2026
Last verified
May 10, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-008313
Document ID
CA-D-00648
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
6a4e46ce193fd71202def370a4d21430cf6cf24d11429695a18c773907dfd122
Analysis generated
May 10, 2026 05:07 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: AWS Bedrock
Document: AWS Service Terms
Record ID: CA-P-008313
Captured: 2026-05-10 05:07:03 UTC
SHA-256: 6a4e46ce193fd712…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/aws-bedrock/aws-service-terms/provision/CA-P-008313/acceptable-use-policy-restrictions/
Accessed: Aug. 12, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does AWS Bedrock's Acceptable Use Policy Restrictions clause do?

The provision anchors service usage rights to a separate policy framework, meaning the scope of permitted uses is defined by reference to the Acceptable Use Policy rather than stated directly in the service terms. This structure allows AWS to modify content restrictions through policy updates without amending the primary service agreement.

How does this clause affect you?

Customers building AI applications on Bedrock must ensure their use cases and generated content comply with AWS's acceptable use policy; violations could result in service suspension affecting any dependent applications or infrastructure.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 281 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with AWS Bedrock?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS Bedrock.