The terms assert that Okta bears no liability for any category of damages, including direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential, or losses based on lost profits, data, or use, arising from use of the Site or its content under any legal theory including negligence.
This analysis describes what Auth0's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision asserts a complete exclusion of all damage categories arising from Site use, including direct damages, which is a broader assertion than clauses that limit liability to a specified cap. The enforceability of blanket direct damage exclusions varies materially by jurisdiction and context.
Interpretive note: The enforceability of a complete direct damages exclusion varies by jurisdiction; certain consumer protection frameworks may limit this clause's practical scope.
The agreement asserts that Okta has no financial liability for any losses arising from use of the Site, regardless of the legal theory asserted or whether Okta was advised of possible damages. Applicable law in certain jurisdictions may limit the enforceability of this exclusion, particularly for direct damages or personal injury.
How other platforms handle this
If you knowingly misrepresent that any activity or material on our Services is infringing, you may be liable to ActiveCampaign for certain costs and damages.
A party's liability for any Liability under these Terms will be reduced proportionately to the extent the relevant Liability was caused or contributed to by the actions (or inactions) of the other party...
The Netflix service and/or some of the Netflix content may not be available at any time as a result of events beyond our reasonable control...we will not be held liable should such events occur.
"IN NO EVENT SHALL OKTA BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSSES OR DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, OR DAMAGES BASED ON LOST PROFITS, DATA OR USE, HOWEVER CAUSED AND, WHETHER IN AN ACTION IN CONTRACT, TORT OR UNDER ANY OTHER THEORY OF LIABILITY (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), ARISING FROM YOUR ACCESS TO, OR USE OF, THE SITE OR ANY CONTENT, MATERIALS, OR INFORMATION MADE AVAILABLE ON OR THROUGH THE SITE, WHETHER OR NOT YOU HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.Excerpt from Auth0's Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Blanket exclusions of direct damages are subject to enforceability scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This provision asserts a complete exclusion of all damage categories arising from Site use, including direct damages, which is a broader assertion than clauses that limit liability to a specified cap. The enforceability of blanket direct damage exclusions varies materially by jurisdiction and context.
The agreement asserts that Okta has no financial liability for any losses arising from use of the Site, regardless of the legal theory asserted or whether Okta was advised of possible damages. Applicable law in certain jurisdictions may limit the enforceability of this exclusion, particularly for direct damages or personal injury.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 284 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Auth0.