Provision record
Atlassian · Atlassian Cloud Terms · View original document ↗

Jurisdiction and venue for all other customers

High severity Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 272 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time Atlassian changes these terms. Follow Atlassian →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Atlassian Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Follow Atlassian →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

This analysis describes what Atlassian's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

ZipRecruiter Medium

The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction over ZipRecruiter's compliance with the EU-U.S. DPF, the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. DPF.

Netflix Medium

you consent as part of these Terms to venue for such cases exclusively in these courts.

Glassdoor Medium

With respect to personal data received or transferred pursuant to the Data Privacy Frameworks, Glassdoor is subject to the regulatory enforcement powers of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Atlassian has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Follow Atlassian → Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
the jurisdiction and venue for actions related to this Agreement in the state and United States federal courts located in San Francisco, California.

Excerpt from Atlassian's Cloud Terms

Provision details

Document information
Document
Atlassian Cloud Terms
Entity
Atlassian
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 8, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-056267
Document ID
CA-D-00707
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
43d2f9eb25e260f7f82440abad02e2eba835af6870815ec9bb7ba9cddb25b8ec
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 01:00 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Atlassian
Document: Atlassian Cloud Terms
Record ID: CA-P-056267
Captured: 2026-05-08 01:00:52 UTC
SHA-256: 43d2f9eb25e260f7…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/atlassian/atlassian-cloud-terms/provision/CA-P-056267/jurisdiction-and-venue-for-all-other-customers/
Accessed: July 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention

Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Atlassian's Jurisdiction and venue for all other customers clause do?

The clause states: “the jurisdiction and venue for actions related to this Agreement in the state and United States federal courts located in San Francisco, California.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 272 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Atlassian?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Atlassian.