Provision record
Anthropic · Anthropic API Usage Policy · View original document ↗

Surveillance and Tracking Prohibition

Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Checked against the version captured Oct 9, 2026 (CA-V-007444); not re-checked against the current version.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Anthropic and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

The policy prohibits using Claude to track or monitor individuals without their consent across physical location, biometrics, movements, online activities, communications, or associations, and explicitly names facial recognition, battlefield management, predictive policing, and law enforcement monitoring as prohibited applications.

ⓘ

This analysis describes what Anthropic's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

This provision establishes categorical restrictions on surveillance-adjacent deployments, explicitly naming facial recognition and predictive policing as prohibited use cases, which directly limits operator deployments in law enforcement technology, national security, and commercial surveillance contexts.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Oct 9, 2026

The updated policy clarifies that Anthropic's acceptable use rules apply to all users of its products and services, including API developers, cloud customers, and app users. The policy now explicitly prohibits weapons development and related activities, and introduces a Cyber Verification Program allowing researchers to apply for adjusted safeguards for authorized dual-use work. Enforcement procedures now include warnings and throttling in addition to suspension or termination. You can apply for the Cyber Verification Program or Life Sciences Verification Program if your work involves authorized dual-use or high-risk use cases covered by real-time safeguards.

View change record →

If You Do Nothing

⚠ Operators deploying Claude in prohibited surveillance contexts may face account suspension or termination and potential reporting to relevant authorities.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Surveillance and Tracking Prohibition and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Target or track a person or their property without that person's consent by monitoring their physical location, biometrics, movements, online activities, communications, or associations, whether in real time, on an ongoing basis, or through analysis of previously collected data. This includes using our products for facial recognition, battlefield management, predictive policing, or monitoring in law enforcement investigations.

Excerpt from Anthropic's API Usage Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages GDPR restrictions on biometric data processing (Article 9), Illinois BIPA restrictions on biometric data collection, CCPA rights regarding tracking and profiling, and the EU AI Act's prohibitions on certain …

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC holds consumer protection authority over deceptive or unfair surveillance and tracking practices affecting consumers.
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    State attorneys general hold enforcement authority over biometric privacy laws (including Illinois BIPA), state-level surveillance restrictions, and consumer protection statutes applicable to tracking and profiling.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Anthropic API Usage Policy
Entity
Anthropic
Date stated by the document
Nov. 12, 2026
As printed in Anthropic’s text (version CA-V-007718), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
March 6, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-007718, captured Oct. 21, 2026
Document ID
CA-D-000013
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-007718)
3f4efd9295fe624bb532af54145fcf3f6ef0ac6919b207aef5ff1f9ea2c4affe
Analysis generated
October 9, 2026 01:46 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
Excerpt not yet checked against a stored version
Citation Record
Entity: Anthropic
Document: Anthropic API Usage Policy
Version: CA-V-007718
Captured: 2026-10-21 00:10:23 UTC
SHA-256: 3f4efd9295fe624b…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/anthropic/anthropic-api-usage-policy/surveillance-and-tracking-prohibition/
Accessed: Oct. 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Anthropic's Surveillance and Tracking Prohibition clause do?

This provision establishes categorical restrictions on surveillance-adjacent deployments, explicitly naming facial recognition and predictive policing as prohibited use cases, which directly limits operator deployments in law enforcement technology, national security, and commercial surveillance contexts.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Anthropic?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.