Provision record
Anthropic · Anthropic API Usage Policy · View original document ↗

High-risk AI Recommendation Mandatory Disclosure

Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Checked against the version captured Oct 9, 2026 (CA-V-007444); not re-checked against the current version.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Anthropic and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

The policy requires that any individual who receives advice or is subject to a decision produced using a High-risk AI Recommendation must be informed that AI was involved in generating it, though the specific AI system or provider does not need to be named.

ⓘ

This analysis describes what Anthropic's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

This provision establishes a mandatory disclosure obligation that operators must implement at the point of delivery for any High-risk AI Recommendation, affecting consumer-facing product design and workflow documentation across twelve defined high-stakes domains.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Oct 9, 2026

The updated policy clarifies that Anthropic's acceptable use rules apply to all users of its products and services, including API developers, cloud customers, and app users. The policy now explicitly prohibits weapons development and related activities, and introduces a Cyber Verification Program allowing researchers to apply for adjusted safeguards for authorized dual-use work. Enforcement procedures now include warnings and throttling in addition to suspension or termination. You can apply for the Cyber Verification Program or Life Sciences Verification Program if your work involves authorized dual-use or high-risk use cases covered by real-time safeguards.

View change record →

If You Do Nothing

⚠ Operators who fail to implement required AI disclosure for High-risk AI Recommendations may face account enforcement actions including throttling, suspension, or termination under Anthropic's Usage Policy.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle High-risk AI Recommendation Mandatory Disclosure and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
An individual who receives advice or who is the subject of a decision based on a High-risk AI Recommendation must be clearly told that AI was used to produce it. Users do not need to identify Anthropic, Claude, or the model used.

Excerpt from Anthropic's API Usage Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages EU AI Act transparency obligations for high-risk AI systems, GDPR requirements for transparency in automated processing, and FTC guidance on AI disclosure in consumer-facing contexts.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC holds authority over unfair or deceptive practices in consumer-facing AI disclosure contexts, including failures to disclose AI involvement in material decisions.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Anthropic API Usage Policy
Entity
Anthropic
Date stated by the document
Nov. 12, 2026
As printed in Anthropic’s text (version CA-V-007718), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
March 6, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-007718, captured Oct. 21, 2026
Document ID
CA-D-000013
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-007718)
3f4efd9295fe624bb532af54145fcf3f6ef0ac6919b207aef5ff1f9ea2c4affe
Analysis generated
October 9, 2026 01:46 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
Excerpt not yet checked against a stored version
Citation Record
Entity: Anthropic
Document: Anthropic API Usage Policy
Version: CA-V-007718
Captured: 2026-10-21 00:10:23 UTC
SHA-256: 3f4efd9295fe624b…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/anthropic/anthropic-api-usage-policy/high-risk-ai-recommendation-mandatory-disclosure/
Accessed: Oct. 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Anthropic's High-risk AI Recommendation Mandatory Disclosure clause do?

This provision establishes a mandatory disclosure obligation that operators must implement at the point of delivery for any High-risk AI Recommendation, affecting consumer-facing product design and workflow documentation across twelve defined high-stakes domains.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Anthropic?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.