This analysis describes what Amazon's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The prohibition covers a spectrum of conduct—from direct threats to active encouragement—and extends to violence, terrorism, and the broader category of other serious harm.
Users are prohibited from using AWS services in any way that threatens, incites, promotes, or actively encourages violence, terrorism, or other serious harm.
How other platforms handle this
May harm the reputation of Tinder or its affiliates, meaning the uploading or sharing of content on the Tinder platform that is defamatory to Tinder or its affiliates or advocates misuse of the Service...
Political content, including for dissemination in electoral campaigns.
Gore, such as dismemberment, beheadings, mutilations, and exposed organs/bones/muscle
"to threaten, incite, promote, or actively encourage violence, terrorism, or other serious harm;Excerpt from Amazon's AWS Acceptable Use Policy
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The prohibition covers a spectrum of conduct—from direct threats to active encouragement—and extends to violence, terrorism, and the broader category of other serious harm.
Users are prohibited from using AWS services in any way that threatens, incites, promotes, or actively encourages violence, terrorism, or other serious harm.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 245 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon.