Airtable · Airtable Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Limitation of Liability and Damages Cap

High severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time Airtable changes these terms. Get same-day alerts →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Airtable Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Get same-day alerts →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

Document Record

What it is

Airtable disclaims liability for indirect, consequential, incidental, special, punitive, and exemplary damages including loss of profits, data, and goodwill. Total aggregate liability for any claims is capped at fees paid to Airtable in the twelve months preceding the claim, applied cumulatively across all claims rather than per individual incident.

This analysis describes what Airtable's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision establishes a cumulative aggregate liability cap equal to twelve months of fees paid, which for free-tier users results in a cap of zero dollars. The cumulative rather than per-claim structure means that the cap applies across all claims arising during the relevant period, which is operationally material for organizations with significant data stored in Airtable.

Interpretive note: The enforceability of the consequential damages disclaimer and cumulative liability cap varies by jurisdiction and may be constrained by applicable consumer protection law in EU, UK, and certain U.S. state contexts.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, Airtable's total financial exposure for any claims brought by a user is limited to fees paid in the prior twelve months, applied cumulatively and not per incident. Users on free plans receive no fee-based damages recovery under this structure. Indirect and consequential damages including data loss and loss of profits are disclaimed entirely to the maximum extent permitted by law.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Limitation of Liability and Damages Cap and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Monitoring

Airtable has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT WILL WE OR OUR AFFILIATES, AGENTS, SUPPLIERS, OR LICENSORS (OR OUR OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, AGENTS, OFFICERS, OR DIRECTORS) BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, OR DATA, OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THE USE OF, OR INABILITY TO USE, OUR SERVICES. IN NO EVENT WILL WE OR OUR AFFILIATES, AGENTS, SUPPLIERS, OR LICENSORS (OR OUR OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, AGENTS, OFFICERS, OR DIRECTORS) BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY CLAIMS, PROCEEDINGS, LIABILITIES, OBLIGATIONS, DAMAGES, LOSSES, OR COSTS IN AN AMOUNT EXCEEDING THE AMOUNT OF FEES YOU PAID TO US HEREUNDER DURING THE TWELVE (12) MONTH PERIOD PRIOR TO WHEN THE CLAIM AROSE. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS CUMULATIVE AND NOT PER CLAIM OR INCIDENT.

Excerpt from Airtable's Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1. REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: EU consumer protection law and certain state consumer protection statutes may limit the enforceability of liability caps and consequential damages waivers against consumers. The document acknowledges jurisdictional variance with the statement that these limitations apply only to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law. GDPR may impose liability obligations on data processors that cannot be fully disclaimed by contract. 2. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. For enterprise customers storing substantial business-critical data in Airtable, the twelve-month fee-based cap and consequential damages disclaimer create a significant mismatch between the potential value of stored data and Airtable's contractual liability exposure. Organizations should assess whether this risk profile is acceptable or whether enterprise agreements with modified liability terms are available. 3. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and EEA consumers may be entitled to invoke consumer protection provisions that override contractual liability caps. California and other state consumer protection statutes may also limit the enforceability of these disclaimers in consumer contexts. The cumulative cap structure may be subject to challenge in jurisdictions that require per-incident liability assessment. 4. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Vendor risk assessments should account for the cumulative cap structure when quantifying residual risk from Airtable service failures, data loss, or security incidents. Organizations with data loss risk exposure significantly exceeding twelve months of subscription fees should evaluate whether additional contractual protections or cyber insurance coverage is warranted. 5. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should document the liability cap exposure as part of vendor risk management frameworks. For organizations in regulated sectors where data loss carries regulatory liability, the gap between Airtable's contractual liability cap and actual regulatory exposure should be assessed and addressed through internal risk management mechanisms.

Full institutional analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Get same-day alerts when this changes → Get Analyst

Monitor: same-day alerts on the platforms you choose. Analyst: full institutional analysis.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has authority over consumer contract provisions that may constitute unfair or deceptive practices, including liability limitations that may be contrary to consumer protection standards
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    State attorneys general may have authority to evaluate enforceability of consequential damages waivers and liability caps under state consumer protection statutes
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Airtable Terms of Service
Entity
Airtable
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-014206
Document ID
CA-D-00551
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
21c5b9ee3b9a9aebeb949489e27933437e1762d5dc99f4c3ba20cdcb9000708f
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 05:02 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Airtable
Document: Airtable Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-014206
Captured: 2026-07-09 05:02:29 UTC
SHA-256: 21c5b9ee3b9a9aeb…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/airtable/airtable-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-014206/limitation-of-liability-and-damages-cap/
Accessed: July 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Airtable's Limitation of Liability and Damages Cap clause do?

This provision establishes a cumulative aggregate liability cap equal to twelve months of fees paid, which for free-tier users results in a cap of zero dollars. The cumulative rather than per-claim structure means that the cap applies across all claims arising during the relevant period, which is operationally material for organizations with significant data stored in Airtable.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, Airtable's total financial exposure for any claims brought by a user is limited to fees paid in the prior twelve months, applied cumulatively and not per incident. Users on free plans receive no fee-based damages recovery under this structure. Indirect and consequential damages including data loss and loss of profits are disclaimed entirely to the maximum extent …

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Airtable?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Airtable.