ConductAtlas › Compare › Privacy Rights
Cross-platform comparison

Privacy Rights, Cross-Platform Comparison

290 platforms tracked · 5149 provisions · 229 platforms high severity · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

290
Platforms
229
High severity
277
Medium
223
Low
352
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing Midjourney vs Stability-Ai · Privacy Rights provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare privacy rights governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

ai Midjourney California users right to request deletion of personal data
High
What it means
This clause establishes a deletion right for California users but preserves Midjourney's ability to decline requests that fall within defined exceptions, limiting the right's absolute scope.
Consumer impact
You may request that Midjourney delete your Personal Information, but the right is subject to certain limited exceptions that may allow Midjourney to retain data.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
You have the right to request that Midjourney delete any of your Personal Information that we collected from you and/or retained. Unless subject to a certain limited exception, once Midjourney receives and confirms...
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-062016
Recent changes

In an update detected on September 2, 2026, Midjourney removed six substantive sections from its Da…

The change detected on September 2, 2026 involved a modification to one sentence in Midjourney's Te…

Sep 2, 2026 Unknown
Stability-Ai
No Privacy Rights clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any tracked platform updates this provision.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Browse by provision type
Account Control Content Moderation Acceptable Use Restrictions Payment & Fees Refunds & Chargebacks Data Collection Data Usage Data Sharing Data Retention Privacy Rights Arbitration Legal Jurisdiction Liability Limitation Indemnification Platform Discretion Policy Changes Enforcement Actions Monetization Rules Developer / API Restrictions AI / Automated Decision-Making Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries Disclosure and Transparency Requirements Targeting and Audience Restrictions Commission, Payout, and Attribution Terms Landing Page and Destination Requirements Intellectual Property General Contract Terms Export Controls & Sanctions Other