ConductAtlas › Compare › Liability Limitation
Cross-platform comparison

Liability Limitation, Cross-Platform Comparison

281 platforms tracked · 3916 provisions · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

281
Platforms
343
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing Midjourney vs Stability-Ai · Liability Limitation provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare liability limitation governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents.

ai Midjourney Services provided on AS IS basis
What it means
Eliminating all warranties, including title and non-infringement, means users have no contractual guarantee that the Assets they receive are free of third-party intellectual property claims.
Consumer impact
Users receive the Services and Assets with no warranties of any kind, including no guarantee of title or that the Assets do not infringe third-party rights.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
Both the Services and the Assets are provided to Customer on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT...
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-023485
Recent changes
Sep 5, 2026 Medium

Midjourney expanded its privacy policy to provide more detailed disclosure of data collection pract…

May 28, 2026 Medium

Midjourney added a new Community Localization program that allows users to submit translations of t…

Stability-Ai
No Liability Limitation clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get alerts and full clause analysis when a tracked platform updates this provision. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Browse by provision type
Account Control Content Moderation Acceptable Use Restrictions Payment & Fees Refunds & Chargebacks Data Collection Data Usage Data Sharing Data Retention Privacy Rights Arbitration Legal Jurisdiction Liability Limitation Indemnification Platform Discretion Policy Changes Enforcement Actions Monetization Rules Developer / API Restrictions AI / Automated Decision-Making Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries Disclosure and Transparency Requirements Targeting and Audience Restrictions Commission, Payout, and Attribution Terms Landing Page and Destination Requirements Intellectual Property General Contract Terms Export Controls & Sanctions Other