323
Platforms
15
High severity
217
Medium
91
Low
325
Total monitored
Track legal jurisdiction changes Get alerts when any platform updates their legal jurisdiction clause.
Track changes — Professional
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing Midjourney vs Stability-Ai · Legal Jurisdiction provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare legal jurisdiction governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

The clause creates a revenue-based threshold that conditions Asset ownership rights on subscription tier for commercial entities, establishing a differentiated ownership framework based on company size and plan selection rather than universal ownership across all user categories.
Users employed by or representing companies with over $1,000,000 USD annual revenue are required to maintain a Pro or Mega plan subscription to own their Assets under the agreement. Users not meeting this revenue threshold or maintaining the required subscription tier operate under different ownership terms as stated in the clause.
No opt-out available
You own all Assets You create with the Services to the fullest extent possible under applicable law. There are some exceptions: [...] If you are a company or any employee of a company with more than $1,000,000 USD a year in revenue, you must be subscribed to a 'Pro' or 'Mega' plan to own Your Assets.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.

Midjourney removed seven structural sections from its Data Retention & Privacy FAQ on May 12, 2026,…

Midjourney added a table of contents restructuring its Terms of Service on May 2, 2026, organizing …

Midjourney restructured its Privacy Policy on May 2, 2026 by adding table of contents entries and s…

No Legal Jurisdiction clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference Analysis Professional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.

Don't miss the next legal jurisdiction change.

323 platforms have this clause. Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any of them update it.

Professional — $149/mo Watcher — $9.99/mo

323 platforms have legal jurisdiction clauses.

Get same-day alerts when any of them change — with full clause analysis and audit trails.

Get full analysis — Professional
Browse by provision type