ConductAtlas › Compare › Intellectual Property
Cross-platform comparison

Intellectual Property, Cross-Platform Comparison

257 platforms tracked · 2586 provisions · 236 platforms high severity · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

257
Platforms
236
High severity
247
Medium
116
Low
352
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing Midjourney vs Stability-Ai · Intellectual Property provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare intellectual property governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

ai Midjourney Broad copyright license granted to Midjourney
High
What it means
This license is perpetual and irrevocable, meaning Midjourney retains broad rights to the user's Content even after the user stops using the Services.
Consumer impact
Users are required to grant Midjourney extensive and permanent rights over their Content as a condition of using the Services.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
You grant to Midjourney, its affiliates, successors, and assigns a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, sublicensable no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the Content...
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-023531
Recent changes

In an update detected on September 2, 2026, Midjourney removed six substantive sections from its Da…

The change detected on September 2, 2026 involved a modification to one sentence in Midjourney's Te…

Sep 2, 2026 Unknown
Stability-Ai
No Intellectual Property clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any tracked platform updates this provision.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Browse by provision type
Account Control Content Moderation Acceptable Use Restrictions Payment & Fees Refunds & Chargebacks Data Collection Data Usage Data Sharing Data Retention Privacy Rights Arbitration Legal Jurisdiction Liability Limitation Indemnification Platform Discretion Policy Changes Enforcement Actions Monetization Rules Developer / API Restrictions AI / Automated Decision-Making Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries Disclosure and Transparency Requirements Targeting and Audience Restrictions Commission, Payout, and Attribution Terms Landing Page and Destination Requirements Intellectual Property General Contract Terms Export Controls & Sanctions Other