Compare indemnification governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
The indemnification obligation allocates legal and financial risk to users for third-party claims connected to their service usage, establishing that users bear responsibility for defending the company against such claims and their associated costs.
Consumer impact
Users assume a financial and legal obligation to defend Midjourney and cover its expenses if third parties bring claims arising from the user's use of the Services or any Terms violations, shifting defense costs and liabilities to the user.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
To the extent permitted by law, you will indemnify and hold us harmless, our affiliates, and our personnel, from and against any costs, losses, liabilities, and expenses (including attorneys' fees) from third party claims arising out of or relating to your use of the Services and Assets or any violation of these Terms.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Indemnification clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisCompliance
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.