Compare how Midjourney and Stability AI handle training, data retention, liability, arbitration, and governance changes over time.
Governance changes can affect enterprise usage rights, data retention policies, training controls, and dispute handling. This comparison is based on continuously monitored governance documents.
AI Training: Midjourney (Not stated) vs Stability AI (Trains on your content; opt-out).
Data Retention: Midjourney (Not stated) vs Stability AI (Deleted; 365-day window).
Class Action: Midjourney (Not stated) vs Stability AI (Waived).
Stability AI has 5 monitored documents vs Midjourney's 3.
Both vendors require arbitration, which may affect enterprise dispute resolution options.
Stability AI trains on user content; Midjourney: Not stated.
Governance stability reflects document change frequency over the last 30 days. Methodology →
Governance provisions grouped by type. Higher counts indicate more detailed governance language in that area.
No governance changes detected in the last 30 days.
No governance changes detected in the last 30 days.
The prohibition explicitly covers attempts, meaning incomplete or unsuccessful …
This clause establishes a legally grounded opt-out right tied to CCPA definitio…
This clause establishes a deletion right for California users but preserves Mid…
This clause establishes a CCPA-grounded access and disclosure right, giving Cal…
This clause establishes a user notification commitment that gives individuals t…
This prohibition places an affirmative restriction on how users may present AI-…
This prohibition targets deception at the point of end-user interaction, requir…
By prohibiting intentional circumvention of its own built-in safeguards, Stabil…
This prohibition bars a broad range of harmful outputs—discrimination, threats,…
This is an affirmative commitment by Stability AI to escalate CSAM to law enfor…
Get alerts on both platforms and see the full comparison history.