Compare how Midjourney and Stability AI handle training, data retention, liability, arbitration, and governance changes over time.
Governance changes can affect enterprise usage rights, data retention policies, training controls, and dispute handling. This comparison is based on continuously monitored governance documents.
Midjourney updated governance documents 6 times in the last 30 days. Stability AI: 3.
AI Training: Midjourney (Not stated) vs Stability AI (Trains on your content; opt-out).
Data Retention: Midjourney (Not stated) vs Stability AI (Deleted; 365-day window).
Class Action: Midjourney (Not stated) vs Stability AI (Waived).
Both vendors require arbitration, which may affect enterprise dispute resolution options.
Stability AI trains on user content; Midjourney: Not stated.
High-severity provisions include mandatory arbitration, broad data sharing, AI training clauses, and liability limitations. Governance stability reflects document change frequency over the last 30 days. Methodology →
Governance provisions grouped by type. Higher counts indicate more detailed governance language in that area.
This clause establishes a legally grounded opt-out right tied to CCPA definitio…
This clause establishes a deletion right for California users but preserves Mid…
This clause establishes a CCPA-grounded access and disclosure right, giving Cal…
This clause establishes a knowledge-qualified prohibition on collecting data fr…
This clause establishes a user notification commitment that gives individuals t…
This prohibition places an affirmative restriction on how users may present AI-…
This sets an outer retention limit tied to the purposes stated in the notice, b…
While users have discretionary use of their outputs, that discretion is bounded…
Revocability on violation means that non-compliance with the license terms can …
The use of 'may' means the Enterprise License requirement is not automatic at t…
Get alerts on both platforms and see the full comparison history.