Compare how Midjourney and Stability AI handle training, data retention, liability, arbitration, and governance changes over time.
Governance changes can affect enterprise usage rights, data retention policies, training controls, and dispute handling. This comparison is based on continuously monitored governance documents.
Both vendors maintain mandatory arbitration structures that may affect enterprise dispute resolution options.
Both vendors disclose AI training provisions. Review specific opt-out mechanisms and data retention terms before uploading sensitive data.
High-severity provisions include mandatory arbitration, broad data sharing, AI training clauses, and liability limitations. Governance stability reflects document change frequency over the last 30 days. Methodology →
Governance provisions grouped by type. Higher counts indicate more detailed governance language in that area.
No governance changes detected in the last 30 days.
No governance changes detected in the last 30 days.
The policy states that prompts, uploaded images, and generated images may be us…
This provision reflects a legal obligation under US federal law (PROTECT Act, F…
The agreement excludes consequential and indirect damages and caps total liabil…
The agreement imposes a one-year contractual limitations period that is shorter…
The agreement requires all disputes to proceed through binding arbitration admi…
Non-consensual intimate image generation is criminalized or subject to civil li…
This prohibition addresses national security-adjacent use cases and establishes…
This prohibition covers a category of AI-generated content that is increasingly…
Generation of CSAM is a criminal offense in virtually all jurisdictions, and th…
The unilateral right to suspend or terminate access without advance notice is o…