Compare enforcement actions governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This provision expands the scope of enforceable conduct beyond the specific prohibitions detailed in the guidelines document. It establishes that Midjourney's enforcement authority extends to violations of the guidelines' general intent, creating a flexible enforcement framework that is not limited to explicitly stated violations.
Consumer impact
Users operate under an enforcement standard that includes both explicit prohibitions and violations of the guidelines' underlying principles. This means conduct not specifically listed in the guidelines may nonetheless result in enforcement action if determined to violate the spirit of the stated guidelines.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
This is not an exhaustive list. We may take action against users that violate the spirit of these guidelines, even if their actions are not explicitly prohibited.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Enforcement Actions clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisProfessional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.