Compare enforcement actions governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This provision restricts how users and organizations may access and use the service, with non-compliance resulting in account blocking, and it explicitly prohibits commercial redistribution of service access.
Consumer impact
Users with more than one account, or who use automation tools not explicitly approved by Midjourney, risk having their accounts blocked without a described appeals process; sharing account credentials with others is also prohibited under these terms.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
Midjourney accounts are designed for individual use and each user may maintain only one account. With a few rare exceptions that are explicitly granted, Midjourney does not provide an API, nor provide third-party apps or scripts, and automating interactions with Midjourney service is strictly prohibited according to our Terms of Service. Accounts who do not comply with these rules may be blocked. You may not resell or redistribute Midjourney Services or access to the Service (this includes sharing your account).
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Enforcement Actions clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisCompliance
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.