Compare data sharing governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This provision establishes the operational framework under which Midjourney may share user information with government entities and law enforcement without prior user notification. The clause creates multiple disclosure pathways—legal obligation, policy violation, and safety/property protection—that operate independently and do not require user consent.
Consumer impact
Users' information may be disclosed to law enforcement, public authorities, and third parties pursuant to legal process or when Midjourney determines disclosure is necessary to enforce its policies or protect safety and property interests. The provision does not establish requirements for prior notification to users before such disclosures occur.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
We may disclose your information to third parties if we believe disclosure is in accordance with, or required by, any applicable law or legal process, including lawful requests by public authorities to meet national security or law enforcement requirements. We may also disclose information if we believe your actions are inconsistent with our terms of service or policies, or to protect the rights, property, and safety of us or others.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Data Sharing clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisProfessional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.