ConductAtlas › Compare › Data Sharing
Cross-platform comparison

Data Sharing, Cross-Platform Comparison

288 platforms tracked · 4430 provisions · 276 platforms high severity · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

288
Platforms
276
High severity
267
Medium
174
Low
352
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing Midjourney vs Stability-Ai · Data Sharing provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare data sharing governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

ai Midjourney Midjourney discloses data to law enforcement when required
High
What it means
This clause establishes that Midjourney's confidentiality of user data is not absolute—legal compulsion by public authorities can override it.
Consumer impact
Your Personal Data may be disclosed to public authorities, including courts and government agencies, if Midjourney is legally required to do so.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
Under certain circumstances, Midjourney may be required to disclose Your Personal Data if required to do so by law or in response to valid requests by public authorities (e.g. a court or a government agency).
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-061984
Recent changes

In an update detected on September 2, 2026, Midjourney removed six substantive sections from its Da…

The change detected on September 2, 2026 involved a modification to one sentence in Midjourney's Te…

Sep 2, 2026 Unknown
Stability-Ai
No Data Sharing clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any tracked platform updates this provision.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Browse by provision type
Account Control Content Moderation Acceptable Use Restrictions Payment & Fees Refunds & Chargebacks Data Collection Data Usage Data Sharing Data Retention Privacy Rights Arbitration Legal Jurisdiction Liability Limitation Indemnification Platform Discretion Policy Changes Enforcement Actions Monetization Rules Developer / API Restrictions AI / Automated Decision-Making Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries Disclosure and Transparency Requirements Targeting and Audience Restrictions Commission, Payout, and Attribution Terms Landing Page and Destination Requirements Intellectual Property General Contract Terms Export Controls & Sanctions Other