ConductAtlas › Compare › Data Collection
Cross-platform comparison

Data Collection, Cross-Platform Comparison

286 platforms tracked · 3823 provisions · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

286
Platforms
343
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing Midjourney vs Stability-Ai · Data Collection provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare data collection governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents.

ai Midjourney Midjourney collects user prompts and content inputs
What it means
This clause establishes that Midjourney collects a broad range of user-generated input, including multimodal content, which means significant amounts of potentially sensitive user material are subject to Midjourney's data practices.
Consumer impact
Everything you input into Midjourney's Services—including prompts, images, spoken input, photos, videos, documents, and messages—is collected by Midjourney.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
Prompts that you provide (including text, images, and those generated from spoken input and summarized into text), and other content such as photos, videos, documents, and messages that you input into the Services
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-061958
Recent changes
Sep 5, 2026 Medium

Midjourney expanded its privacy policy to provide more detailed disclosure of data collection pract…

May 28, 2026 Medium

Midjourney added a new Community Localization program that allows users to submit translations of t…

Stability-Ai
No Data Collection clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get alerts and full clause analysis when a tracked platform updates this provision. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Browse by provision type
Account Control Content Moderation Acceptable Use Restrictions Payment & Fees Refunds & Chargebacks Data Collection Data Usage Data Sharing Data Retention Privacy Rights Arbitration Legal Jurisdiction Liability Limitation Indemnification Platform Discretion Policy Changes Enforcement Actions Monetization Rules Developer / API Restrictions AI / Automated Decision-Making Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries Disclosure and Transparency Requirements Targeting and Audience Restrictions Commission, Payout, and Attribution Terms Landing Page and Destination Requirements Intellectual Property General Contract Terms Export Controls & Sanctions Other