Compare content moderation governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
The clause creates distinct intellectual property regimes tied to payment status, determining whether users hold copyright to outputs or operate under a non-commercial license from Midjourney. This directly affects permitted use cases, commercialization rights, and asset disposition across the user base.
Consumer impact
Free plan users operate under a non-commercial license that restricts commercial exploitation of generated Assets, while paid plan users receive full copyright ownership enabling unrestricted commercial use. The distinction conditions ownership transfer on active subscription maintenance.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
Subject to the above license, as between you and Midjourney, you own all Assets you create with the Services, provided that you have subscribed to a paid plan. If you are using the Services under a Free plan, Midjourney retains ownership of all Assets generated, and grants you a license under the Creative Commons Noncommercial 4.0 Attribution International License.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Content Moderation clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisCompliance
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.