Compare arbitration governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
The agreement requires all disputes to proceed through binding arbitration administered under AAA Expedited Commercial Rules, waives jury trial rights, and restricts arbitration to a specific venue in California, which may create practical barriers for users located elsewhere.
Consumer impact
Users waive their right to pursue claims against Midjourney in court or before a jury; disputes must proceed through private AAA arbitration in Santa Clara County, California, with each party bearing its own legal fees regardless of outcome.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
In the event a dispute, controversy, or claim arises out of or relating to these Terms ("Dispute"), the Dispute will be resolved by binding arbitration rather than in court. The parties will first try in good faith to settle any Dispute within 30 days after the Dispute arises. If the Dispute is not resolved within 30 days, it shall be resolved by binding arbitration by the American Arbitration Association's International Centre for Dispute Resolution in accordance with its Expedited Commercial Rules in force as of the date of this Agreement ("Rules"). The parties will mutually select one arbitrator. The arbitration will be conducted in English in Santa Clara County, California, USA. By agreeing to mandatory arbitration as set forth herein, You and Midjourney knowingly and irrevocably waive any right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, or counterclaim, except that either party may apply to any competent court for injunctive relief necessary to protect its rights pending resolution of the arbitration.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Arbitration clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisCompliance
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.