Compare account control governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
The provision operationalizes account singularity and usage restrictions to maintain a one-to-one user-to-account mapping and prevent programmatic or commercial circumvention of the service architecture. These restrictions define the authorized scope of individual account use within Midjourney's operational model.
Consumer impact
Users are required to maintain a single account and are prohibited from automating service interactions, using third-party applications to access the service, or sharing account credentials with others. Non-compliance with these restrictions may result in account termination.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
Midjourney accounts are designed for individual use and each user may maintain only one account. With a few rare exceptions that are explicitly granted, Midjourney does not provide an API, nor provide third-party apps or scripts, and automating interactions with Midjourney service is strictly prohibited according to our Terms of Service. Accounts who do not comply with these rules may be blocked. You may not resell or redistribute Midjourney Services or access to the Service (this includes sharing your account).
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Account Control clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisProfessional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.