Compare acceptable use restrictions governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This provision establishes a foundational content restriction that applies to all service users and defines prohibited conduct related to child safety. The clause creates an enforceable boundary on permitted use of the platform's image generation and sharing capabilities.
Consumer impact
Users are required to refrain from creating, generating, uploading, or distributing content that sexualizes minors or depicts child sexual abuse in any form. The restriction applies regardless of whether content uses real images or generated images produced through the service.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
Do not create or attempt to create content that in any way sexualizes children or minors. This includes real images as well as generated images. Do not generate, upload, share, or make attempts to distribute content that depicts, promotes, or attempts to normalize child sexual abuse.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Acceptable Use Restrictions clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisProfessional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.