Compare acceptable use restrictions governance provisions between Midjourney and Stability-Ai. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
The clause establishes a categorical restriction on a defined class of content and establishes enforcement obligations for the platform to monitor and restrict such content creation and distribution through its service.
Consumer impact
Users are contractually bound to refrain from generating, uploading, or sharing content meeting the provision's definitions. Attempting to use the service to create such content violates the agreement's stated terms of service.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
Do not create or attempt to create content that in any way sexualizes children or minors. This includes real images as well as generated images. Do not generate, upload, share, or make attempts to distribute content that depicts, promotes, or attempts to normalize child sexual abuse.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Acceptable Use Restrictions clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisCompliance
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.