When you sign up for a new app or service, you probably don't read the terms of service. Almost nobody does. But buried in those documents is often a clause that strips you of one of your most fundamental legal rights: the ability to sue in court.

Mandatory arbitration clauses require you to resolve any dispute with the company through private arbitration — not a jury, not a judge, and often not even a public record. In many cases, these clauses also include class action waivers, which prevent you from joining together with other affected users to hold a company accountable.

What We Found

ConductAtlas monitors the legal documents of 170+ digital platforms daily. Of those, 112 include some form of mandatory arbitration provision — that's 66% of all platforms we track.

The breakdown by severity:

Why It Matters

Arbitration isn't inherently bad — it can be faster and cheaper than litigation. But mandatory arbitration with class action waivers creates a significant power imbalance. Individual claims are often too small to pursue alone, which means companies can engage in widespread harmful practices knowing consumers have no practical recourse.

The FTC has taken enforcement actions against companies with unfair arbitration provisions, and several states — including California and New York — have passed laws limiting their scope. But the patchwork of protections is inconsistent, and most consumers remain unaware that they've signed away their rights.

What You Can Do

Some platforms offer opt-out mechanisms — typically a 30-day window after account creation to opt out of arbitration in writing. These are rarely advertised and easy to miss. ConductAtlas tracks which platforms offer opt-outs and how to exercise them.

For compliance teams and legal counsel: arbitration provisions are a critical due diligence item when evaluating vendor contracts. Knowing which platforms use them — and how they've changed over time — is essential for risk assessment.