This analysis describes what xAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users are contractually required to litigate in specific Texas courts, which may impose geographic and financial burdens on non-Texas users.
Users must litigate any covered dispute in specific Texas courts, regardless of where they are located.
How other platforms handle this
You and Tinder consent to the exercise of personal jurisdiction of courts in the State of Texas and waive any claim that such courts constitute an inconvenient forum.
Any legal action or proceeding arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located in New York County, New York, USA...
the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the state and Federal courts located in San Francisco, California
"all disputes related to these Terms, the Service, or any patents...shall be brought and must proceed exclusively in the federal U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas or state courts located in Wichita County or Tarrant County, Texas...Excerpt from xAI's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
Users are contractually required to litigate in specific Texas courts, which may impose geographic and financial burdens on non-Texas users.
Users must litigate any covered dispute in specific Texas courts, regardless of where they are located.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by xAI.