X maintains a policy classifying and prohibiting non-consensual nudity, commonly known as non-consensual intimate imagery, with defined reporting and enforcement procedures for violations.
This analysis describes what X's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The provision documents the operational framework through which X identifies prohibited non-consensual intimate content and implements remedial actions, establishing the institutional standards and procedural mechanisms for policy enforcement.
Interpretive note: The specific removal timelines, escalation procedures, and definitions of covered content are contained in the linked sub-policy, not this index document.
This provision establishes that X classifies non-consensual nudity as a policy violation with defined reporting procedures, meaning individuals who discover intimate imagery of themselves posted without consent have a documented mechanism to seek removal under this policy.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Non-Consensual Nudity Policy and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
X has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"Non-consensual nudity policy - Learn what we classify as non-consensual nudity and our reporting and enforcement procedures for violations of this policy.— Excerpt from X's X Rules and Policies
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Non-consensual intimate imagery is criminalized at the federal level in the US under the SHIELD Act and in numerous states, and the EU has addressed it through the Digital Services Act's illegal content provisions. The UK Online Safety Act specifically addresses non-consensual intimate image sharing as priority illegal content. Platforms may face civil liability in some jurisdictions for failing to remove such content expeditiously. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High from a user safety and regulatory compliance perspective. Platforms operating in jurisdictions where non-consensual intimate imagery is illegal face mandatory takedown obligations with specified timelines, and inadequate enforcement mechanisms may attract regulatory action. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: UK users have specific protections under the Online Safety Act, which designates non-consensual intimate images as priority illegal content requiring expedited removal. EU users benefit from DSA illegal content obligations. US state laws vary in criminalization and in civil liability frameworks for platform non-compliance. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations providing trust and safety services to X or operating in partnership with X on content moderation should assess whether their service agreements specify response time requirements for non-consensual nudity reports consistent with applicable legal obligations. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should review the full non-consensual nudity policy to assess whether X's reporting and removal procedures satisfy the jurisdictionally applicable timelines and standards in the EU, UK, and US state contexts. Victim support organizations advising individuals on content removal should review the policy's reporting procedures.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The provision documents the operational framework through which X identifies prohibited non-consensual intimate content and implements remedial actions, establishing the institutional standards and procedural mechanisms for policy enforcement.
This provision establishes that X classifies non-consensual nudity as a policy violation with defined reporting procedures, meaning individuals who discover intimate imagery of themselves posted without consent have a documented mechanism to seek removal under this policy.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by X.