Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
The document states that Writer does not use customer data, user inputs, or AI-generated outputs for model training, and that customers retain control over how their data is used.
This analysis describes what Writer's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes a foundational commitment regarding the use of enterprise customer data submitted to the platform, which is a material consideration in enterprise vendor selection and procurement due diligence. The commitment is referenced alongside a separate Data Processing Agreement, which would contain the contractual and remedial terms governing enforcement of this restriction.
The updated Trust Center no longer displays granular cookie consent controls, cookie type descriptions, or preference management options. Users can no longer review or manage individual cookie categories (strictly necessary, functional, performance, targeting) through the Trust Center interface. Information about how cookies are used and what opt-out options exist is now available only through the separate Privacy Policy.
View change record →The updated Trust Center now discloses that Writer uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance website functionality, analyze usage, personalize experience, and support online advertising. The revised language states that by continuing to use the site, users agree to cookie use as described in Writer's Cookie notice. The terms explicitly establish that under applicable U.S. laws, users have the right to opt out of cookies used for targeted advertising purposes. You can manage your cookie preferences, including targeting cookies, by adjusting settings on the updated consent interface.
View change record →The document states that data submitted to the Writer platform, including prompts, responses, uploaded media, and tuning data, will not be used to train Writer's AI models. Under these terms, enterprise customers retain control over their data usage, subject to the terms of the separate Data Processing Agreement.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle No Model Training on Customer Data and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Writer has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"WRITER does not train its models on your data, nor does it train on user inputs or any outputs. You control how your data is used.Excerpt from Writer's Trust Center
1. REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages GDPR principles regarding purpose limitation and data minimization, CCPA provisions regarding use of personal information, and emerging AI-specific regulations including the EU AI Act, which addresses training data governance for AI systems. The FTC holds authority over unfair or deceptive practices regarding data use representations made to consumers and businesses. If Writer's stated no-training commitment were found inconsistent with actual data practices, FTC enforcement authority and GDPR supervisory authority would be relevant. 2. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The no-training commitment is a central differentiator in enterprise AI procurement and is explicitly cited by enterprise customers in the document as a key selection factor. If this commitment is not contractually enforced in the Data Processing Agreement with adequate audit rights and breach remedies, the operational reliance placed on it by enterprise customers may exceed its contractual basis. 3. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and EEA customers face heightened exposure given GDPR's purpose limitation principle and the EU AI Act's evolving requirements around training data transparency. California customers may evaluate this commitment under CCPA's restrictions on use of personal information beyond disclosed purposes. Any jurisdiction with comprehensive AI legislation may assess this commitment against model documentation or transparency requirements. 4. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams should confirm that the Data Processing Agreement referenced in this document contains explicit contractual language prohibiting training on customer data, specifies audit rights to verify compliance, and identifies remedies for breach of this commitment. The document alone is a disclosure, not a binding contract provision, and reliance should be placed on the DPA terms. 5. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should obtain and review the full Data Processing Agreement to confirm the no-training restriction is explicitly stated, scoped to all data categories described on this page, and enforceable. Organizations in regulated industries including healthcare and financial services should confirm this commitment extends to any data processed under sector-specific regulatory frameworks.
This provision establishes a foundational commitment regarding the use of enterprise customer data submitted to the platform, which is a material consideration in enterprise vendor selection and procurement due diligence. The commitment is referenced alongside a separate Data Processing Agreement, which would contain the contractual and remedial terms governing enforcement of this restriction.
The document states that data submitted to the Writer platform, including prompts, responses, uploaded media, and tuning data, will not be used to train Writer's AI models. Under these terms, enterprise customers retain control over their data usage, subject to the terms of the separate Data Processing Agreement.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Writer.