Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
The document states that Writer is committed to EU AI Act compliance but describes its current posture as one of ongoing evaluation of obligations rather than confirmed full compliance.
This analysis describes what Writer's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision discloses that Writer's EU AI Act compliance posture is not yet finalized, which is a material consideration for EU-based enterprise customers assessing vendor obligations under that regulation. Enterprise customers subject to the EU AI Act as deployers of AI systems should evaluate what obligations Writer's evolving compliance posture may place on their own compliance programs.
The updated Trust Center no longer displays granular cookie consent controls, cookie type descriptions, or preference management options. Users can no longer review or manage individual cookie categories (strictly necessary, functional, performance, targeting) through the Trust Center interface. Information about how cookies are used and what opt-out options exist is now available only through the separate Privacy Policy.
View change record →The updated Trust Center now discloses that Writer uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance website functionality, analyze usage, personalize experience, and support online advertising. The revised language states that by continuing to use the site, users agree to cookie use as described in Writer's Cookie notice. The terms explicitly establish that under applicable U.S. laws, users have the right to opt out of cookies used for targeted advertising purposes. You can manage your cookie preferences, including targeting cookies, by adjusting settings on the updated consent interface.
View change record →The document states that Writer is evaluating its obligations under the EU AI Act and will evolve its approach as regulations develop. EU-based enterprise customers relying on Writer for AI deployments should assess how Writer's ongoing compliance evaluation interacts with their own EU AI Act obligations as deployers.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle EU AI Act Compliance Status and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Writer has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"We are committed to complying with the EU AI Act as we continue to evaluate our obligations under it and are similarly committed to complying with our obligations under current laws and regulations, in particular those that apply to AI systems and the development of those systems. As laws, regulations, and guidance from regulators continue to evolve, we will continue to follow these developments closely and likewise evolve our approach as needed.Excerpt from Writer's Trust Center
1. REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The EU AI Act imposes obligations on providers and deployers of AI systems based on risk classification, with requirements including transparency, human oversight, technical documentation, and conformity assessments for higher-risk systems. Writer's statement that it is still evaluating its obligations indicates that its classification of its systems under the EU AI Act and corresponding compliance measures have not been finalized. The European AI Office and national market surveillance authorities hold enforcement authority. 2. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. Enterprise customers in the EU who deploy Writer's AI systems as part of workflows affecting regulated functions may themselves have obligations under the EU AI Act as deployers, and those obligations may depend in part on documentation and transparency provided by Writer as the AI system provider. The evolving compliance posture described in this document may create gaps in documentation currently available to enterprise customers for their own compliance assessments. 3. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and EEA customers face the most direct exposure given the EU AI Act's applicability. Organizations in regulated sectors including financial services, healthcare, and human resources should assess whether Writer's AI systems, as deployed in their workflows, may be classified as higher-risk systems under EU AI Act Annex III. 4. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams should request current EU AI Act compliance documentation from Writer, including risk classification assessments, technical documentation, and planned conformity assessment timelines. The Data Processing Agreement should be assessed for provisions addressing Writer's obligations as an AI system provider under the EU AI Act. 5. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: EU-based enterprise customers should monitor Writer's EU AI Act compliance disclosures as they evolve and confirm that any documentation required for deployer-side compliance is available from Writer on a defined timeline. Organizations with near-term EU AI Act compliance obligations should assess whether Writer's current documentation meets their requirements.
This provision discloses that Writer's EU AI Act compliance posture is not yet finalized, which is a material consideration for EU-based enterprise customers assessing vendor obligations under that regulation. Enterprise customers subject to the EU AI Act as deployers of AI systems should evaluate what obligations Writer's evolving compliance posture may place on their own compliance programs.
The document states that Writer is evaluating its obligations under the EU AI Act and will evolve its approach as regulations develop. EU-based enterprise customers relying on Writer for AI deployments should assess how Writer's ongoing compliance evaluation interacts with their own EU AI Act obligations as deployers.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Writer.