Windsurf · Windsurf Security & Data Handling · View original document ↗

Intellectual Property Ownership and Output Restriction

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time Windsurf changes these terms. Get same-day alerts →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Windsurf recorded 6 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Get same-day alerts →
Monitor governance changes for Windsurf Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Get same-day alerts →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

Document Record

What it is

The document states that output produced by Devin is treated as the user's intellectual property for commercial purposes, subject to a restriction prohibiting use of that output to train models that reverse engineer or compete with Devin.

This analysis describes what Windsurf's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision asserts a use restriction on output that would otherwise be characterized as user-owned intellectual property. The restriction on training competing models using Devin output may require legal evaluation in open-source deployment contexts or where users intend to develop adjacent AI tooling.

Interpretive note: The scope of 'competing product to Devin' is not defined in the document, creating interpretive uncertainty regarding what downstream uses of output are restricted.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

High Jul 6, 2026

The updated terms establish a default policy permitting Windsurf to use customer data for model training purposes to improve services. Previously, the company required explicit opt-in before any training use. Under the revised policy, data training occurs automatically for free and paid users unless they affirmatively opt out through the Data Controls settings page. Once disabled, the terms state your data will not be used for training and Zero Data Retention will be enabled with model providers. Enterprise customers operate under a different standard, requiring express prior written consent before any training use occurs.

View change record →
Medium Jun 23, 2026

The updated document establishes explicit commitments about how Windsurf protects data and manages security. The terms state that all data transmission is encrypted in transit and at rest, that access to production systems is restricted to a small number of employees or contractors based on business roles, and that production systems are monitored via logging, error handling, and monitoring dashboards. The document discloses that Windsurf obtained SOC 2 Type II certification as of March 2024 and that all employees and contractors are required to use multi-factor authentication and receive annual security training. These disclosures describe organizational practices rather than establishing new user-facing rights or obligations.

View change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, users hold intellectual property rights to Devin-generated output and may use it for commercial purposes, but the agreement restricts use of that output specifically for training models that would compete with or reverse engineer Devin. The enforceability of this restriction on downstream use of user-owned output may vary by jurisdiction.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Intellectual Property Ownership and Output Restriction and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Monitoring

Windsurf has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
The output — code, work product, or other — produced by Devin is considered the user's intellectual property and can be used for the Customer's commercial purposes, with the exception of using the output to train models that would attempt to reverse engineer and/or build a competing product to Devin.

Excerpt from Windsurf's Security & Data Handling

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages intellectual property law, including copyright and trade secret frameworks, and may interact with competition law in certain jurisdictions. The enforceability of a use restriction on output asserted to be user-owned IP is a question that applicable law, including contract and IP law, would need to resolve and is not determined by this document's assertion alone. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. Organizations using Devin in AI development contexts should assess whether their downstream use of Devin-generated code or work product could be characterized as training a competing model under the terms of this restriction. Legal review is advisable for organizations building AI coding tools that incorporate Devin-generated output. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: The enforceability of restrictions on the use of output asserted to be user-owned IP may vary by jurisdiction. EU competition law and U.S. antitrust principles may be relevant to the scope and enforceability of this restriction in certain commercial contexts. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: B2B contracts that involve sublicensing or redistribution of Devin-generated output should address compliance with this restriction. Procurement teams evaluating Devin for AI development pipelines should assess whether their intended downstream uses fall within the scope of this restriction. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should assess whether any planned downstream use of Devin output, including incorporation into training datasets for internal AI tools, could be characterized as training a competing model. The document's definition of 'competing product to Devin' is not specified, creating interpretive uncertainty for edge cases.

Full institutional analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Start Insight · $19.99/mo Start with Monitor · $4.99/mo

Provision details

Document information
Document
Windsurf Security & Data Handling
Entity
Windsurf
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-015181
Document ID
CA-D-00783
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
87e0c922df6f81ddd3b0b0cd1a4c89e032f31245c90a31c47bfc8fc12173717b
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 07:22 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Windsurf
Document: Windsurf Security & Data Handling
Record ID: CA-P-015181
Captured: 2026-07-09 07:22:40 UTC
SHA-256: 87e0c922df6f81dd…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/windsurf/windsurf-security-data-handling/provision/CA-P-015181/intellectual-property-ownership-and-output-restriction/
Accessed: July 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
Start Insight · $19.99/mo Start with Monitor · $4.99/mo

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Windsurf's Intellectual Property Ownership and Output Restriction clause do?

This provision asserts a use restriction on output that would otherwise be characterized as user-owned intellectual property. The restriction on training competing models using Devin output may require legal evaluation in open-source deployment contexts or where users intend to develop adjacent AI tooling.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, users hold intellectual property rights to Devin-generated output and may use it for commercial purposes, but the agreement restricts use of that output specifically for training models that would compete with or reverse engineer Devin. The enforceability of this restriction on downstream use of user-owned output may vary by jurisdiction.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Windsurf?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Windsurf.